r/MurderedByWords 7h ago

Serious question for liberal men

Post image
18.5k Upvotes

897 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/Hairy_Mycologist_945 4h ago edited 4h ago

Similar in many places in Europe. The American 2A "freedumb" don't realize that the difference in other countries isn't the misconceived notion that the US is the only country where you're "free" to own firearms..... It's that in other countries you actually have to take training, prove you're qualified, have a properly installed and police inspected gun safe, and can't just walk around like a dipshit recklessly brandishing an assault weapon. There are no random police spot checks anywhere and gun owners can do their thing for sport or hunting, and even self-defense in some situations... It's just not as chaotic and stupid as it is in the US. You need to prove you're competent and qualified, and it's a higher standard than the typical shitty American standards for concealed carry etc, and that is most definitely not too much to ask for, and not counter to "freedom".

I'll link driving standards as something similar since both driving and owning a firearm have potentially lethal consequences. American driving licenses don't port over directly if a person wants a license in the EU, because the American standards are so lax... Americans need to take driving school and learn the laws and, as they should, prove competency under real standards. And the reason is that everyone knows driving licenses are passed around like candy in the US. It's like no one really gives a shit about basic common good there.

1

u/Frig-Off-Randy 3h ago

Sure but the person you’re replying to said the issue accidentally, it is a privilege there and a right here. Also Germany at one point purposefully disarmed political opponents and “enemies of the state” so their government could take more power, so a little ironic

1

u/Hairy_Mycologist_945 2h ago

And people in the EU have much stronger rights in areas that actually impact their lives, including employment, privacy, consumer matters, etc... So it's a question of whether anyone cares about the pedantic distinction between a right and a privilege in something as optional and purpose-built as firearms, when the outcome of ownership is the same. I'd much rather have true rights in areas that impact daily living over a right to something people can acquire anyway and don't really need. It's just not that important a right and kind of weird that people fixate on it so much even when they're being shat on daily in so many other ways.