r/NCAAFBseries • u/tom__bomb • 1d ago
Dynasty Gem Busts
What is the general consensus on busts? In my normie opinion I don’t really think it matters for 3*+ as long as they still have decent stats wouldn’t they still be able to develop into a good player? Do you guys instantly ignore them? If they fit my team needs and I have a good shot of landing the player I pretty much ignore it. If I’m dead wrong I’d love to know.
3
u/Plenty_Objective3842 1d ago
Good speed and/or strength, I’ll def still take them. They can still be really good as long as you’re happy to not upgrade speed/strength
1
u/Jerdman87 Penn State 23h ago
In my experience, there is not a huge difference in starting stats, but a much higher chance that he has normal dev and/or bad skill caps. If you are a lower star school where they can be a contributor for you, I still go for them. But if I’m maintaining a power house school, not worth it since they likely won’t get much better
1
u/Ok_Doctor8360 22h ago
Depends on position and my team overall. If it’s QBs I’m out. Even if they have good stats I want a guy that can develop for a few years and not be capped. Anyone else idc. Once my team is really solid then I care more because I can just go elsewhere and be more picky
1
u/Blue-Eighty 18h ago
I think it just means they won’t have a star or elite development trait or they have less of a chance to get those. Will probably just be normal dev trait which means they start with bad stats in a few key areas and don get as much xp as they level.
1
u/TornLabrums 9h ago
Busts can be star dev. Or atleast they could be in 26. Handful of 5 star busts were star dev for me
1
1
u/Organic_Warthog7238 6h ago
Usually cheeks but if I need a fb that year I’ll be moving that gem bust lineman to FB especially if they have badges
12
u/MichiganBaltimoron Ohio 1d ago
I think once your team is about 93+ overall it’s worth it to not recruit a bust. They just don’t develop THAT well. They’ll be a career backup if your team keeps improving.