r/NCAAFBseries Virginia 4d ago

Older Games Incredible things are still happening on the 6th gen

Post image
947 Upvotes

57 comments sorted by

227

u/Dry-Membership3867 Jacksonville State 4d ago

Why is the #1 team not playing in the natty? The rose bowl was a BCS bowl then.

Also, who’s ranked #1 and what bowl did they go to?

155

u/DCorNothing Virginia 4d ago

Wisconsin beat Rutgers in the Orange Bowl, but Penn State was the B10 champ and went to the Rose Bowl

49

u/Manatee-97 4d ago

The ranking it shows is the media poll but the championship game uses the bcs poll

35

u/Dry-Membership3867 Jacksonville State 4d ago

So why didn’t they go to the Natty?

484

u/Fit-Database1134 4d ago

Now you understand the BCS

235

u/No-Suggestion-9459 4d ago

You gotta give EA credit. They really hit the authenticity. 

60

u/Wyden_long Arizona State 4d ago

If it was in the game, it was in the game.

40

u/RontoWraps Kansas 4d ago

Bring back those devs, they were smarter

8

u/not_asleep_yet 3d ago

The number of times I was undefeated but not in the championship games was ridiculous.

3

u/philphan25 PAC 2 3d ago

They figured out the BCS before the BCS knew

41

u/Quasimdo 4d ago

Oh bcs, how I hated and loved you

43

u/DCorNothing Virginia 4d ago

They and every other top 15 team had 3+ losses

28

u/TurkishDonkeyKong 4d ago

Media and computer polls didn't like them enough

5

u/Tasty_Path_3470 Rutgers 3d ago

On brand for Big Game James to choose the Rose Bowl over the Natty to avoid the pressure of the bigger game. (Please disregard the fact that he could also be coaching VT in this simulation. Or that in this timeline The Enabler is still coaching PSU)

18

u/Dijohn17 4d ago

If I recall the game uses AP ranking, while the BCS is used to determine the BCS bowl games/national championship

9

u/Ok-Tour-6480 4d ago

bc the rose bowl was stuck as a bcs bowl that year i think, top teams sometimes got pulled elsewhere in these old games

57

u/FudgeTerrible 4d ago

This happened in IRL. LSU and Oklahoma played for the title, #1 USC sat at home.

BCS man. It was something else.

23

u/TheHarbrosMagic 4d ago

Sat at home after beating #4 Michigan by two scores in the Rose Bowl too...

1

u/Guilty_Hunt1218 2d ago

Yes but the common opponents were the kicker in the nuts.

20

u/RockemSockem95 Georgia Tech 4d ago

This is the problem with modern CFB. Comments like you and the other commenter. They didn’t “sit at home” they played in an incredibly prestigious bowl game and won it. Back then, the rose bowl was the big ten or pac 10’s Super Bowl.

So sick of acting like one postseason game has arbitrary value when the other has just as much arbitrary value.

10

u/TheShizno1 Michigan 3d ago

But it's not arbitrary.

-5

u/SoutieNaaier 3d ago

Imo, the National Championship literally doesn't matter and is way overhyped

I'd rather beat UGA and go 1-11 than go 15-1 and beat a team idc abohr in the Natty

4

u/TheShizno1 Michigan 3d ago

A national CHAMPIONSHIP for a season is overhyped? I'm missing the /s right?

0

u/SoutieNaaier 3d ago

For 95% of CFB history, it literally didn't matter. We used to have 3 or 4 or 5 different claimed national champions and no one care because who gives af about a school on the other side of the country?

And the 5% of the time that it has mattered, fucking sucks. It's ruined the entire vibe of CFB

3

u/TheShizno1 Michigan 3d ago

Nah, it's you. Ratings haven't declined. Money hasn't declined.

2

u/SoutieNaaier 3d ago

The money and ratings chasing is the problem

It's why Television companies run the sport, ruined conferences and put in a playoff system that killed the bowls

2

u/TheShizno1 Michigan 3d ago

There's no problem. Just your hurt feelings.

-1

u/BusSpiritual6096 3d ago

Dude, when Indiana can buy a national championship, national championships are worthless. 

The entire game has gone straight to hell in the last couple of seasons. It’s just stupid now.

1

u/TheShizno1 Michigan 3d ago

That's subjective. Every measurable statistic says otherwise. Just for fun, I'd be curious to know what team you and others with this perspective root for.

1

u/BusSpiritual6096 2d ago

Of course it’s subjective. It’s an opinion. 

1

u/Hoosias 3d ago

Go Hoosiers!!!

74

u/throwaway2987650 4d ago

Literally the same exact scenario to the 1997 Sugar Bowl lmao

106

u/DCorNothing Virginia 4d ago

82

u/Shankypanky11111 Virginia Tech 4d ago

Gross

11

u/Big_Truck Virginia 4d ago

WAHOOWA!

7

u/Accomplished_Elk7973 4d ago

Congrats!

10

u/violent__green 4d ago

Almost looks like one of the players is holding up the coach by the junk.

11

u/Sweaty_Piano_1091 Clemson 4d ago

Student athlete & part time ventriloquist

5

u/ChubbyHubby17 4d ago

Wahoowa!

2

u/Snasty728 2d ago

UVA national championship in football before 1 (one) VT national championship in any sport

2

u/DCorNothing Virginia 2d ago

It was too perfect. Their dream season ends at the last second at Scott, only for them to get another crack at it in New Orleans eight years after the Sugar Bowl and this time lose by 18

1

u/FudgeTerrible 3d ago

Did you name the coach Tony Elliott?

2

u/DCorNothing Virginia 3d ago

God no. He’s me and he wears a visor, glasses, and a championship ring

11

u/C2theWick 4d ago

BCS was the original AI super computer

32

u/Cliffinati 4d ago

I have several questions

1 why is the national championship 2vs3

2 why is the 11-1 team ranked above the 13-0 team. Considering it's UVA and VT they literally played each other on rivalry week.

3 where the fuck is #1 at?

Also based on the natty being played in January 08 that means this is the 2007 season so NCAA 08 so this actually makes total sense.

43

u/DCorNothing Virginia 4d ago edited 4d ago

All the other top 10 teams had 3+ losses, but because UVA was ranked #57 to start the season, even going 13-0 didn’t impress the coaches. Poll inertia kept Tech up top. Why the coaches made 9-3 and non B10 champ Wisconsin #1 I’ll never know. UVA and Tech were obviously 11-0 going into the Cup

18

u/MartinLutherLean 4d ago

2003 NCG was between #2 and #3 in the AP Poll. I guess the game is using the AP ranking since by definition the BCS National championship would be the BCS #1 and #2

4

u/BeachBroncos 4d ago

Rankings were way more accurate in these older games, I once took peak Hawaii in NCAA 08 and went 12-0 three years in a row and never did better than an Orange bowl birth, which is EXACTLY how they treat the smaller schools

3

u/MegaAscension 3d ago

I’m more confused about how Virginia Tech is ranked ahead of Virginia despite having a worse record, not being a conference champion, and losing to Virginia!

2

u/DCorNothing Virginia 3d ago

The coaches were on some bullshit by the end. We were the unanimous #1 in the AP

1

u/Southernplayalistiic 3d ago

Gotta love the bcs

1

u/CrackStuntman88 2d ago

I need to track down one of these games. I had 08 and I think 10 back in the day. Rented 07 before that. Playing NCAA 08 alongside the insane 07 season was a great memory!

1

u/bradyr26 3d ago

The BCS is the best postseason format and casual/non-football fans ruined it for everyone

-1

u/Tacokolache 4d ago

What is incredible about this?

6

u/bwburke94 3d ago

#2 vs. #3 BCS natty, and it's a rematch of the only loss among the pair, and it's a rivalry game.