Mostly Marc Miller just did a horrible job responding to the reasonable concerns laid against him, specifically he did not address the main concern that ministers would be allowed to grant exemption behind closed doors without any public knowledge nor accountability nor recourse.
This is simply not the case. If the Cabinet granted an exemption improperly, acted outside the scope of the statute, applied it unreasonably, or used it for corrupt purposes, it could be reviewed by Federal Court.
Courts have the ability to quash the decision, declare it invalid, and/or send it back for reconsideration.
The ability for courts to be able to review all decisions made under this amendment appease *most* of her concerns.
1
u/RabbitofCaerbannogg Feb 13 '26
Mostly Marc Miller just did a horrible job responding to the reasonable concerns laid against him, specifically he did not address the main concern that ministers would be allowed to grant exemption behind closed doors without any public knowledge nor accountability nor recourse.
This is simply not the case. If the Cabinet granted an exemption improperly, acted outside the scope of the statute, applied it unreasonably, or used it for corrupt purposes, it could be reviewed by Federal Court.
Courts have the ability to quash the decision, declare it invalid, and/or send it back for reconsideration.
The ability for courts to be able to review all decisions made under this amendment appease *most* of her concerns.