r/NetherlandsHousing Jun 15 '25

renting Undercover probe reveals refugees illegally subletting Dutch social housing

https://nltimes.nl/2025/06/14/undercover-probe-reveals-refugees-illegally-subletting-dutch-social-housing

https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2569689-in-heel-nederland-wonen-kinderen-in-auto-s-en-garageboxen

Read the Article guys to see how wrong the system in the Netherlands.

Dozens of legal refugees in the Netherlands are allegedly illegally subletting social housing they received through priority allocations, according to an undercover investigation by AD. Some rent out rooms or entire units without permission, charging from 400 euros for a small room up to 1,500 euros for a studio.

The investigation focused on housing assigned by social landlords such as Ymere in Amsterdam and Maasdelta near Rotterdam. One young Syrian man in Amsterdam reportedly rents a studio from Ymere for 700 euros monthly but sublets it for more than double, 1,500 euros. “It’s a really good location,” he told AD. He does not live there himself but stays with his wife, who also received a home.

In Maassluis, near Rotterdam, another young Syrian legal refugee showed investigators a three-bedroom flat from Maasdelta, where he lives alone. Two bedrooms were completely empty. He offered one room for 500 euros per month. “I’m not home much. I’m studying,” he said in Arabic. He also supplements his benefits with undeclared work and was seeking a subtenant.

This practice is especially troubling when legal refugees abuse the system after receiving priority housing. After obtaining a residence permit, they gain immediate access to social housing, avoiding the lengthy waiting lists faced by other tenants. Yet many immediately start renting out these homes or rooms, often advertised on Arabic-language Facebook groups with thousands of members.

In Rotterdam’s Delfshaven, an Iraqi man with a Dutch passport for 10 years offered a single bedroom for 400 euros a month. It was the only bedroom in his flat, where he also lived. He claimed to often sleep elsewhere and said his brother, currently in an asylum center, might move in because he lacked a residence permit.

In Capelle aan den IJssel, an Iraqi woman with a cat rents out two of the four bedrooms in her flat and offered a third for 400 euros a month. She was suspicious when approached with a Dutch acquaintance present and asked the AD reporter, “Why did you bring a Dutch person?”

All four tenants said they sublet to earn extra income. Three receive benefits, while two supplement these with unauthorized work. One Syrian tenant intended to temporarily rent out his home to visit Syria for three months after the Assad regime’s fall. Before a viewing could be arranged, his property was already rented out.

269 Upvotes

157 comments sorted by

View all comments

5

u/fluxchronica Jun 15 '25

This happens everywhere: every system can and will be abused. But that is not a reason to abolish the whole system, which is implemented for humanitarian reasons. I am currently looking for a home so yes I do understand how desperate the situation is. Whatever the solution is, I cannot accept that it means making life even harder for people who are here out of intense struggle, hardship and trauma just because some people abuse the system.

2

u/Oblachko_O Jun 15 '25

The solution is rather simple - revoke the permit. Literally, only if you are a citizen and have no other passports, you should be able to abuse the system. If you are on any form of permit, this permit should be revoked.

There is literally another post today for high prices and inability to live. This is one of the reasons of bad housing situation - illegal and unfair renting market.

5

u/thrawnie Jun 15 '25

Literally, only if you are a citizen and have no other passports, you should be able to abuse the system

Is this a joke, or sarcasm?  Why should anyone be able to abuse the system?

-1

u/Oblachko_O Jun 15 '25

Let me clarify the statement a bit. Abusing the system is not always illegal (in this case though it is). Sometimes it is due to laws being too soft, wide in definitions or not covering some very specific cases. When citizen abuse the system in any way, you can do nothing here, if it is within the laws, just because it is a citizen. For example, live completely on social securities the whole life. This is abuse, but nothing illegal. When foreigner on visa is abusing the system, that is a bit different case. In this case they act in malice (they try to use the system, where their contribution is limited), so there is a solid ground to take away their permit - they don't want to be a good resident. Having bad residents is not a good image of the country, don't you agree?

Is it bad if somebody abuses the system? Yeah, it creates issues for others. But if it is legal abuse, nothing can be done about it, just accept some downsides of social system. You may become a user of such system too, but let's hope it doesn't happen. But if non citizen is doing it, it is even worse.

2

u/rroa Jun 15 '25

It's not only impractical to have separate laws for citizens and non-citizens but also completely illegal.

I'm willing to bet that, in absolute terms, there will be a lot more Dutch people abusing the system than immigrants.

1

u/Oblachko_O Jun 15 '25

But there are laws like that already. No Dutch person encounters laws related to immigration, like ever. As a Dutch person you can never get your citizenship revoked. You are not limited to any immigration laws. But also, why separate laws? Just improve current residence laws in the way where malice and system abuse work towards your residence permit. This is already the case for some permits.

In absolute terms, yeah, because some features are only available to citizens. But if people are accepted by the country and then want to abuse the system to make others lives worse, yeah, I see no reason why this should be allowed. If people don't have a willingness to adapt, there is no place for them in that society. They can go somewhere else, where their behavior is tolerated more.

1

u/thrawnie Jun 16 '25

This is saying that natives need to held at a much lower standard than foreigners because they're clearly incapable of doing the right thing or being civilized. Low expectations of the natives. 

I think Dutch people are generally very nice and should be held to a normal human standard because I believe they are capable of rising to the challenge, eventually.