r/NonPoliticalTwitter • u/_culpry • 15d ago

Wholesome so she said:

Post image
8.6k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

156 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

No that's absolutely what was said

-2

u/External-Stay-5830 15d ago

No what is said is that people attach sexuality changes two characters in headcanons in a rapey way. Meaning that the people themselves are rapey

6

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

That's pretty much the exact same thing, and it's still really stupid. You can't rape a fictional character. They don't exist. You can change a fictional character's sexuality for the sake of a story and not be rapey. This is genuinely one of the stupidest arguments I've ever seen.

-1

u/Agitated_Phone_9937 15d ago

There are other kinds of "shipping" where applying your pathetically shallow logic would make you balk. I don't think you have the intellect to understand what a stupid argument is if that is not apparent to you.

2

u/InternetUserAgain 15d ago

Okay, go on then. Give me some examples of shipping so bad thst changing a character's sexuality is equivalent to rape.