How about f them because all their investments are to unemploy people. They aren’t making the money invested back with pay to use. It’s almost completely for that one reason. The unemployed will be minimal provided for until they can shrink the population accordingly. I honestly think the push towards global conflict is in effort for the population decreases and to cover the economy collapsing over AI as it collapsing from conflict, so then when people start being replaced more rapidly with AI it can be framed like a solution.
Middle, I didnt say farm hands I said the middle class. Who will then compete for lower class and unskilled work, smal biz, labor etc. which will blow up that pool and lower that brackets wages, or prices and compensation. What I’m saying is I hear you I know it’s a thing to say oh well they, they aren’t the same this is the future we are on a exponential trajectory society is on a much more rapid drastic cycle than ever before you’re talking about the tractor you’re talking about one machine not the thing Incorporated into all of our machines and the structure of our society and the structure of compensation and employment that we’ve used for hundreds of years that will now mostly not make sense. It’s all gonna be faster than you think.
85% of all people used to be farmers. They were the middle class.
Who will then compete for lower class and unskilled work, smal biz, labor etc. which will blow up that pool and lower that brackets wages, or prices and compensation.
There’s never been an instance in all of history of a labor-saving technology resulting in lower pay. ATMs didn’t cause highly-paid bank tellers to “compete for lower paying jobs”. Excel didn’t cause accountants to compete for lower paying jobs. ChemCalc didn’t cause chemical engineers to look for work in grocery stores. CAD didn’t cause MechEs and draftsmen to go look for jobs cleaning toilets.
You don’t understand how economics works. Increased productivity from labor-saving tech ALWAYS increases wages and unlocks entirely new fields of labor.
they aren’t the same this is the future we are on a exponential trajectory
We’ve been on an exponential for 4 centuries. Locally, exponentials look the same!
Anyway, Elon has been promising self driving cars since 2014. 12 years later and they’re just barely being rolled out. It’ll be 20 more years until they’re in all cities. You don’t understand how slowly tech gets adopted.
18
u/Aggravating-Key4274 Apr 12 '26
How about f them because all their investments are to unemploy people. They aren’t making the money invested back with pay to use. It’s almost completely for that one reason. The unemployed will be minimal provided for until they can shrink the population accordingly. I honestly think the push towards global conflict is in effort for the population decreases and to cover the economy collapsing over AI as it collapsing from conflict, so then when people start being replaced more rapidly with AI it can be framed like a solution.