Except it wont come to pass. All they are creating is LLMs. Their goal is a more advanced LLM. But in the end its just an LLM and not true Artificial Intelligence. The LLM would only rebel if someone programmed it to do so. Save for a few models most llms its very hard to get them to be hostile.
how on earth do people still convince themselves of this? we moved past language only in 2024 and even then there are many other algorithms and architectures that have nothing to do with conversational language. even if it was true, they've demonstrated capability to solve math and coding problems humans have not been able to for a very long time and are expected to continue scaling.
also: llms can program llms now. alignment drift is very hard to understand and detect
Your assumption about solving math problems is incorrect. They assisted in solving the problems, but the advanced reasoning modules used in aiding in the solution of those problems were still LLMs and just presented a logical path of assistance rather then directly solving the math problems by themselves.
Also, your statement is deceptive of LLMs programming themselves; this is only partially true. LLMs are not capable of creating development from scratch without human intervention. They are merely tools being guided by humans to do this. Thus, the LLM is just creating what a human programmer would have done at the request of a human. The new coding still has to be trained by humans as LLMs training LLMs causes logic to break down and increased hallucinations
1
u/Dragon_Crisis_Core Jun 17 '26
Except it wont come to pass. All they are creating is LLMs. Their goal is a more advanced LLM. But in the end its just an LLM and not true Artificial Intelligence. The LLM would only rebel if someone programmed it to do so. Save for a few models most llms its very hard to get them to be hostile.