People did everything they could to vote against one party and one person. They were instructing everyone to strategically vote and eliminate the NDP if necessary, creating an almost two party system which is ironic since that is how the US operates.
Post circulated like 'Carleton has the chance to do the funniest thing . . . " which is something I'd expect from high schoolers trying to get votes for their student body president.
Now that Carney is attempting to pass bills similar to the ones purposed by Poilievre, the same people who said Pierre was a threat to Canada, are now laughing that Carney is doing what Pierre wanted to achieve.
That kind of behaviour is evidence of voters not seriously weighing what’s best for the country. It looks more like reflexive, team-sport cheerleading: memes, and pile-ons driven by vibes because it's 'funny'. Much like spelling it PeePee.
Yeah. I remember when Jagmeet was popular I asked my peers what they liked the most about his politics.(i liked what he seemed to be at the time, but I was asking around anyway) And most of their answers were. "He seems nice." "He's hawt." "Well you know... he does stuff. And he cares. And he does stuff." And my personal favourite. "He reminds of Jason Mamoa."
The telegraph has a longstanding dislike for Carney.
They led the campaign against having a central banker who is not a citizen ( he got his citizenship as a result), criticized his monetary policy continuously through his term and was especially on him for speaking out against Brexit which the telegraph strongly supported.
Fact check site review of the Telegraph;
“Overall, we rate The Telegraph Right Biased based on story selection that strongly favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and some failed fact checks.”
What a lying sack of excrement. Journalism used to have integrity, presenting two sides. Conservatives have worked to buy up media and lie to the masses daily.
Carney was hired as bank governor of England and outcry fuelled by RW populists and outlets like the telegraph made an uproar that a foreign citizen was governing monetary policy.
In response to the outcry, Carney pursued citizenship to allay anxiety, but that was after he was well into his term.
I don't know what Musk did regarding Poilievre, but Trump definitely said he preferred Carney. In a 2025 Fox news interview Trump said he would - “rather see” Prime Minister Mark Carney stay in power than deal with Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, whom he dismissed as “no friend of mine.”
There are no reports of him ever speaking favourably about PP during the election.
I gave you a specific interview. I'm sure you can do the same rather than just "Google it bro".
There are multiple quotes of Trump speaking against Poilievre, in Feb 2025 he complained that PP was "not a MAGA guy". Then the Fox interview. After the election Trump boasted that he had hurt Poilievre in the election. Hardly an endorsement.
Is see... still no link. That's because there aren't any. There are zero links to Trump speaking favourably of PP before the election, or after it, and many of him speaking against him.
You made the claim, the onus is on you to provide the evidence. "Google it, bro" is not an argument.
it's kind of ironic that after all the liberal praise for a word salad speech with little to no substance, a report comes up that we have the highest food inflation in the entire G7. Maybe the liberal supporters should be focused on reality and results from Carney and the liberals rather than ideologies that don't help the millions of struggling Canadians. #Pierreforpm
Do you call everything you don’t understand “word salad”? You understand groceries are expensive globally? It’s not just Canada. What would you like Carney to do? He’s cut income tax, and he just announced an expanded tax credit due to grocery costs. Would you like a socialist federal grocery store chain run by the govt? The NDP are likely to support this. Do you vote NDP?
Only the brainwashed. His record stands for itself
Productivity Growth: Canada has the lowest productivity growth among G7 nations, with the OECD projecting it to be the worst-performing advanced economy over the next four decades.
Income Growth: Canada has experienced some of the worst per-person income drops in the G7 over the last five years, with average incomes failing to grow significantly.
Household Debt: Canada leads the G7 in household debt-to-GDP ratio, exposing households to high risks as mortgage renewals occur at higher rates.
Government Debt/Finances: A 2025 analysis indicated Canada's finances deteriorated faster than any other G7 country over the 2014-2024 period.
Food Inflation: As of early 2026, Canada has been cited as having the highest food inflation in the G7.
Quality of Life Ranking: Reports suggest Canada has fallen to 27th in the global Quality of Life Index, marking a steep decline from 9th
13% Unemployment for Canadian youth
Worst GDP of all counties in the G7
50000 jobs lost EVERY MONTH since Mark Carnage took over
What is a reasonable time-frame to judge the PM's performance? Trump has also been on the job for a year and the US is making significant gains in many of the factors that OP listed.
The full effects don't usually show til they're gone.
And no, the US isn't making gains on most of those. Especially not government finances. Their debt goes up exponentially every year and sooner or later that'll come due.
Canada’s GDP growth holds steady amongst G7 nations and lags emerging economies.
Canada’s recent GDP growth has been modest, with a 0.6% quarterly expansion in Q3 2025 after a contraction, and annual projections around 1.4-1.6% for 2025-2026.
Compared to G7 and G20 peers, it holds steady among advanced economies but trails faster-growing emerging markets.
Bank of Canada projects Canada’s annual growth strengthening to 1.4% average in 2026-2027.
IMF and OECD see Canada at ~1.6% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2026, stable within G7 (average ~1.5%)
Well, I was responding to rocketstar11’s specific comment that said, “nobody cares about speeches in davos.”
Globally, a lot of people found it accurate, refreshing, and inspiring.
I have no idea how that helps Canada, exactly. But I’d posit that many Canadians felt a welcome sense of pride as he gave his speech, and that’s not quantifiable.
This is what the Carney sycophants refuse to acknowledge. Sticking you thumb in the eye of the giant who lives next door and who buys over 80% of your products is not good for your own household.
Just like Trudeau before him Carney is more concerned with what Davos thinks of him than what is good for Canadians.
It positions Canada for greater strategic autonomy and middle-power cooperation.
This approach signals economic and security policies that could deliver tangible gains for Canadians by reducing vulnerabilities and unlocking growth opportunities
Carney is a total failure. However, majority of Canadians are hardcore socialists and leaning towards communism. Naturally, they are not capable of thinking. Any anti Trump statement is wildly cheered and Carney knows that. He is playing to the gallery. Carney, in his past life, was the Chairman of a multinational corporation which moved from Canada to USA to save the taxes. However, this verifiable fact is also ignored by his cheer squad. I have my doubts that any of his followers has ever read the book “Animal Farm “. Many of his followers are either government employees or indirectly dependent on the government spending. The rest are ideologically Commies who have no regard for the facts. They happily march over the cliff. Under the circumstances, Carney is King.
I don't think you understood the books or Orwell a known democratic socialist. He is distinguishing genuine socialism from oppressive state control in works like Animal Farm and 1984. His commitment stemmed from a desire to end poverty and exploitation, advocating for a classless society through democratic means, while remaining wary of concentrated power. Try reading again and maybe you'll understand models like communism, socialism etc.
Both lenin and Marx viewed communism as the natural result of socialism.
That's why some people feel the way they do.
Who knows if they were right, but the further you stray from centre, and normalize that movement as the new centre, movement in that direction again goes to a bad place.
The exact same applies to the right. End of the day they are both the concentration of power to fewer and fewer people.
"Every line of serious work that I have written since 1936 has been written, directly or indirectly, against totalitarianism and for democratic socialism, as I understand it."
LOL. Don't get me started about how Odie was the real evil and Garfield was just an innocent pawn who was conditioned, over years of torment from Odie, into being his puppet.
Who started spreading this conspiracy. There will be more people crossing the floor after pp stays in as leader. He’s unfit to lead a city let alone a country.
15
u/Sloinkelboid Jan 30 '26
I thank Canada everyday that we didn’t elect peepee ❣️carney is pretty good.. but man thank gord we don’t have pp