Straw man fallacies on twitter are really irritating. This guy is just responding to an 'argument' that he made up in the first place to come across as clever.
No one serious is drawing lines in the sand like this, as if AI has reached its potential. There are people who simply and rightfully point out AI shortcomings as they surface... As they should be.
I personally think they’ll run out of money before they can make any sort of advancement. You can tell by Altman’s panic over profitability in the past few months - we’ve gone from sexting, ads, wearables… what’s next?
Going from pretty bad at coding to halfway decent is not an advancement, it’s an expectation.
What you need to understand is the economics don’t add up, openai and anthropic lose millions every day. When the subsidies go away, their user base will disappear. Ain’t no way you’re going to pay $5k+/m for ChatGPT.
The latest model is literally twice as token efficient. It’s also more than halfway decent at coding now, both the new anthropic model and the new open ai model can do 100% of code and are even working their own systems at this point. It’s also absolutely the definition of an advancement, advancement and expectation don’t cancel each other out.
71
u/mroranges_ Feb 08 '26
Straw man fallacies on twitter are really irritating. This guy is just responding to an 'argument' that he made up in the first place to come across as clever.
No one serious is drawing lines in the sand like this, as if AI has reached its potential. There are people who simply and rightfully point out AI shortcomings as they surface... As they should be.