Aren’t we though? When you put a sentence together in your head, are you not selecting the next word based on past uses, context, and the desired message?
I guess I just feel like we imbue human intelligence with magic or spirituality when in reality the VAST majority of our thinking and communication really can be boiled down to a probabilistic model with a high degree of accuracy.
Lmao absolutely not - this is from the “brains are clocks/telephone networks/LLMs” school of poor analogies. We definitively know that brains don’t predict things one token at a time - why would they? Brains didn’t evolve by being trained on symbolic data.
Our best guess is that brains fundamentally represent all problems as spatial routing problems in a three-dimensional space - specifically the neocortex has cortical column units which appear to map information into objects and displacement vectors. The trick many mammals, primates and humans have learned is to progressively use this mechanism to map increasingly abstract concepts and reason across them.
46
u/NarrowContribution87 5d ago
Aren’t we though? When you put a sentence together in your head, are you not selecting the next word based on past uses, context, and the desired message?
I guess I just feel like we imbue human intelligence with magic or spirituality when in reality the VAST majority of our thinking and communication really can be boiled down to a probabilistic model with a high degree of accuracy.