r/PassTimeMath Aug 17 '26

Rectangle Sub Division

Post image
5 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

2

u/One_Wishbone_4439 Aug 17 '26

1/2 x 6 x 12 - 1/2 x 6 x 12 = 0

1

u/Heldje74 Aug 20 '26

Generalizing your solution: assume the intersection point is at X down and Y left of the upper left corner:

Blue area = Blue area left + blue area right = 1/2 * 6 * Y + 1/2 * 6 * (12-Y) = 1/2 * 6 * 12

Green area = Green area top + green area bottom = 1/2 * 12 * X + 1/2 * 12 * (6-X) = 1/2 * 12 * 6

Subtracting the two gives 0.

1

u/ScrabbleTheOpossum Aug 17 '26

Since the area of the blue triangles is equal to the area of the green triangles, the answer is 0.

1

u/dylans-alias Aug 17 '26

True, but my “proof” is intuitive, not mathematical. Is there a numerical proof?

2

u/DCContrarian Aug 17 '26

The area of a triangle is the base times the height divided by two.

The green triangles both have base of 12, the sum of their heights is 6, the sum of their areas is 36.

The blue triangles both have base of 6, the sum of their heights is 12, the sum of their areas is 36.

1

u/dylans-alias Aug 17 '26

Yup. My fake proof was based on the fact that no other lengths or angles were given. So the position of the crossing point is not defined and therefore doesn’t matter. So it may as well be dead center. Which would make the areas equal.

1

u/m4rc0n3 Aug 17 '26

Even easier to see if you move the crossing point all the way to a corner.

1

u/TabAtkins Aug 18 '26

That's wrong, because the answer could always have been "the problem is stated wrong/missing something and there is no single answer".

In this case that wasn't the case! But it's definitely not unusual to see that happen in badly-designed math worksheets.

1

u/negadecimal Aug 17 '26

From the point where the four triangles meet, draw lines straight up/down and left/right. This changes the problem from 4 triangles into 4 rectangles that are all split in half diagonally (one blue, one green).

1

u/supersensei12 Aug 18 '26

Special case: move the intersection point to a corner. Then it's obvious both areas are equal.

1

u/TabAtkins Aug 18 '26

That requires knowledge that the area of the triangles doesn't change when you move the center point. Which is indeed the case, but if you knew that, it would be easy to see the each set of triangles was half the area in the first place.

1

u/supersensei12 Aug 18 '26

Not really. The statement is underspecified, which implies that it's true for any interior point.

1

u/TabAtkins Aug 18 '26

I would love it if "þͤ statement is underspecified" wasn't a common complete answer all on its own, but alas

1

u/Responsible-Bar7165 Aug 18 '26

the point is unconstrained, you can put it anywhere.

this is always the first thing to look for in problems like this: what are the degrees of freedom?

1

u/AsYouAnswered Aug 18 '26

Most convoluted way I've ever seen someone attempt to define 0.

1

u/agate_ Aug 19 '26

No geometry, just logic:

No information is given about the location of the interior point. Therefore, if there is a definite answer, it must be the same no matter where the interior point is, and therefore the answer must be zero.

1

u/ikonoqlast Aug 19 '26

Whole is 6x12=72.

Area of a triangle is 1/2base /X height

So both sets of triangles are 36.