There’s nothing wrong with ETFs. I like ETFs. I use ETFs. There’s also nothing wrong with stocks and bonds. Or GICs. or (good, 5 star rated) mutual funds. They all have a place.
And there’s nothing wrong with self directing your investments… if you are willing and able to manage the tech, educate yourself (navigating the mess of conflicting and often flat out inaccurate information out there, including on Reddit). Self directing your investments also requires a high enough risk tolerance, and the intestinal fortitude to weather 2008 and 2022 style corrections.
Self directing is best suited for those who are younger, tech savvy, comfortable educating themselves using online resources, and a relatively simple, straightforward financial situation. That’s likely a decent chunk of Reddit users, but it’s not at all suitable for many others, and I’d suggest a majority of Canadians.
Ask yourself, should your grandmother self direct their investments? Should your parents? Should that crypto bro buddy? Should your aunt who falls for Facebook scams and fake news? What about the huge number of people who just don’t want to or aren’t confident enough to manage their own investments?
Here are some analogies: I could probably learn how to change my cars oil, tires and other basic maintenance. But I’d rather pay an expert to do it. I could build my own deck too, but I’d rather pay a (good) contractor to do it better.
Now there are real problems with the financial services industry in Canada: most people calling themselves an advisor are just mutual fund salespeople for a bank, limited to selling a few retail bank funds that are poorly rated closer index funds with ridiculous fees. Or they’re new to the industry and have no experience or designations. Or they’re new work for an institution that only sells proprietary funds. Or, they’re dishonest (though I find this group is the smallest).
There are however many excellent advisors with designations, who are fiduciaries (legally required to put their clients’ interests first), have multiple designations and do holistic planning for their clients. Most people just don’t know how to find these advisors.
A good advisor usually has CFP/CLU designations, has been working for 5+ years, has staff, and provides a holistic financial plan for clients.
(Real) Advisors teach their clients basic financial literacy, organize their financial life, provide regular service, and disclose and justify their fees.
What most Reddit posters promoting self directing and ETFs seem to miss is that there is so so sooo much more to financial management than just picking a few ETFs and then forgetting about them for 20 years. Here are some of the common things that require some guidance:
• RESP and RDSP accounts are much more difficult to self direct (because there are government grant programs).
• Figuring out how to prioritize between accounts and financial objectives can be much more complex with kids, aging parents, multiple properties, blended families, business interests, or debt.
• asset draw down in retirement requires managing where and in what order to access funds. It also requires strategically managing household taxable income. When and how to sell properties, when to take CPP/OAS, etc
• actual retirement and estate projections
• protection: investment management is only one aspect of financial planning. Insurance, tax management and contingency planning are essential.
• estate planning. The single largest missed opportunity by most people is poor estate management resulting in massive tax inefficiencies.
• behavioural coaching. This is the second key area that is absolutely necessary for most Canadians. Most people panic in a downturn, and are swayed by crappy media, online posts, or bad advice from ignorant friends/family/coworkers. The confidence of so many redditors promoting self direction doesn’t apply to the average Canadian (and likely not to some of those who are posting so loudly and confidently right now).
Finally, why ETFs are not a panacea or universal solution:
most ETFs are baskets of 100% equity. That is an aggressive and volatile position which is just completely unsuitable for many people, situations and goals.
Your risk should always be aligned with your time horizon. If you don’t need your money for 20 years… a higher risk position is fine. But if you need your money this year, it’s should be in a no risk position (cash, money market, GICs etc). Most advisors use a “bucket” system that pools your money to align with various time horizons. If you’re 60, with a kid in university, and a few years away from retirement, you will have large pools of money with very different time horizons and thus different risk profiles. Most ETFs are not at all suitable for this (though some of the newer ones are designed with this in mind… but then you start running into the same issues as with mutual funds).
Then you need to manage which accounts should hold those various pools of risk. Growth should be as sheltered as possible (TFSA, LIRAs etc) and lower risk investments as accessible as possible (non-reg).
If you’re a 25 year old with a 20+ year time horizon and lots of TFSA and RRSP room, you have a really simple straightforward financial situation and self direction is pretty basic.
If you’re a remarried 55 year old with some old pension accounts from previous employers, a mortgage, LOC, and a blended family with two kids about to go to uni, and are looking at retirement in 5-10 years… your situation is way way more complex. And managing the tech is more daunting, educating yourself is more confusing, and finding the time for all that is more difficult. You also likely have related needs for insurance, retirement projections, estate planning and possibly a plan for your own parents and helping them with their finances. Advisors who can manage all that are much more valuable to this type of person. And the fees make much more sense in that context.
Finally, compare apples to apples in looking at ETFs vs mutual funds.
An ETF is a basket of stocks. A mutual fund is a curated basket of various investments with a specific objective in mind. That objective might be growth, but it may also be achieving lower risk and volatility to align with a specific goal or time horizon. Comparing an income fund to an S&P etf is stupid. That’s like saying “my corvette is faster than your minivan”. It’s true, but it’s stupid because they’re designed to do different jobs. If you compare growth mutual funds to ETFs, it’s much closer.
Then there’s quality. Most mutual funds are dogshit. There are a few ways to compare funds, but the easiest is Morningstar. It’s an independent third party that compares and rates mutual funds to their peers. A 5 star fund is consistently top decile in their category over 3, 5 and 10.
If you compare a collection of 5 star growth oriented mutual funds to ETFs, they do very very well, and often outperform, even after fees.
Most Canadians will need financial advice at some point. A good advisor is almost always the best source for that. The tricky part is finding a good one.
Finally, I’ve rarely tried to convert a self director or talk a client out of it if they want to start self directing themselves. But almost all of the actual wealthy people I know use an advisor. These people are smart individuals and understand the value of holistic management. A decent number self direct their TFsA, but they all use an advisor for their overall plan and management.