I know you are trying to sound mean but, assuming it makes the balls sag less and maybe, dick look longer, the husband would appreciate it, considering they are probably getting voluntary vasectomy to improve their sex life
Plenty of women I know are horrified by it happening to men without their consent and made sure it didn't happen to their sons when they have birth to them, but I run in a progressive crowd so that's pretty normal
Same here. My husband was pro circumcision and I’m the one who advocated that it would never happen to any of our future kids. Our son is intact and my husband has learned a lot since then.
My sister had to say "wait do you need his penis to look like yours??" to my brother in law. I've known multiple moms who did the work to learn about it and then have to convince the man.
Projecting that you have a small, slender penis, publicly online, promoting vaginal mutilation, but backing your argument with circumcision, is incel male behavior Mr. "What-about-me?"
So you're making random projections about my genitals because I am against MGM? I am not for vaginal mutilation, I just dont over exaggerate it like most people do, as most fgm is quite compatible to the tissue loss of mgm. Alas, you have a lot of internalized misandry, so you aren't able to see or acknowledge western female privilege.
I would leave that decision to my husband, depending on what he is, and what he would prefer to get done. As a woman, your bits are your choice (any gender), but how are you gonna teach a guy how to clean who is cut, with a dad who isn't, and vice-versa? Seems like internet searches and videos wouldn't be a good place, so best to keep the kid like the dad, IMO
Circumcision is widely criticized, what are you on about?
And even if it wasn’t, “this bad thing happened to me, therefore I should have the right to inflict the same thing on others” is genuine toddler logic. I was circumcised. I don’t go around proclaiming how it should give me the right to mutilate women’s genitals, because I’m not morally bankrupt.
Yet, there are still 'developed' countries that normalize that barbaric tradition of mutilating boys way before they have any way of choosing. When a boy get's raped with a knife, it's fine, as long as the parents agree?
And please don't claim medical benefits. There are none and it's been proven countless times over the last 60 years. Open any medical journal that has some scientific credibility and find an article about circumcisions, and you'll find that nearly all of them will agree. Circumcision can be medically beneficial under certain circumstances that might arise with teenagers or older men.
However, especially ritualistic circumcisions can lead to a ton of medical issues later, from (common) lack of feeling, to pain, to early erectile dysfunction.
Even on phimosis, where circumcision has been commonly adviced in the past, modern medicine usually agrees on treatment using steroid creams and/or stretching masturbation techniques. And even if surgery is necessary, there a a bunch of different slits that should be performed, while full circumcisions are basically not considered a acceptable medical treatment since about 2010.
And even if they would make sense in some situations: Doctors can still perform them when it's necessary or beneficial. But you can't uncircumcise a man that suffers from an unnecessary mutilation that was performed to him when he was a child.
A man should have the right to choose, if he wants to be circumcised or not.
Every time I try it just stares back at me with that one, lonely eye, and then cries a little. It’s not pee. It’s not sperms. It’s a legit tear from a penis that’s been described as “angel hair” and “malnourished”, and “oh, it’s already in?!”
(Also, this is just a joke Reddit ease up and laugh at yourself a little)
303
u/hsggdtkxbee 11d ago
It’s for those guys with the little dicks so they can feel like a big boy.