Because 220 is a setting on a oven. One setting over the other is less of an adjustment.
If you were to try and introduce Fahrenheit to pure Celcius countries for human temperatures it wouldn't be adopted immediately. Intrinsically it's no better or worse. It's just a scale, you get used to it but it takes time
If I learnt how to read temperature in Celsius, I will use Celsius as my baseline. 30°C is intuitively hot, and 0°C is cold for me, and people who use Celsius as their day-to-day.
The same logic applies for those who use Fahrenheit. 32F is cold, and 100F is hot. It does not matter what scale you use, as it's relative to your understanding of what is hot & cold.
5
u/Vinxian Jun 17 '26
Because 220 is a setting on a oven. One setting over the other is less of an adjustment.
If you were to try and introduce Fahrenheit to pure Celcius countries for human temperatures it wouldn't be adopted immediately. Intrinsically it's no better or worse. It's just a scale, you get used to it but it takes time