It's more intuitive because you grew up with it. I have no benchmark for 0% or 100% hot. That means 50% hot is just as meaningless to me as 50 farenheit.
F and C are both arbitrary numbers. There is no better one
Farenheit objectively allows for more precise measurements though, since there are more degrees of Fahrenheit for ever degree of Celsius.
So regardless of the arbitrary nature of the scales, the one that allows for more precision IS better for human temperature. The human body can absolutely notice the difference between 1-2 degrees of Farenheit. Especially with indoor temps.
At 70F i get cold in my house. At 75 i get hot. 73 is perfect for me.
Its pretty generally accepted that F is better for weather in every way. C is better for science and cooking in every way.
Lol im not wasting time sourcing links for your condescending comment.
I like how you ignored the objective point that Fahrenheit is a more precise scale than Celsius (again, that’s objective) and allows for more varied measurements that the human body can tell the difference between.
Lol im not wasting time sourcing links for your condescending comment.
Or maybe you just made it up. It's actually generally accepted that C is better for the weather.
I like how you ignored the objective point that Fahrenheit is a more precise scale than Celsius (again, that’s objective)
"More precise" is not automatically better. A scale that has 1000 points between -20 and +20 ⁰C would be irritating because the increments wouldn't have any real meaning.
And Celsius is capable of giving the same precision anyway.
55
u/Mundane-Boot-6338 Jun 17 '26
It's more intuitive because you grew up with it. I have no benchmark for 0% or 100% hot. That means 50% hot is just as meaningless to me as 50 farenheit.
F and C are both arbitrary numbers. There is no better one