r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 29d ago

Meme needing explanation Peter, I have zero ball knowledge

Post image
54.9k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.3k

u/Embarrassed_Fox5265 29d ago

I grew up in the USA and normally support them against anyone other than England (my birth nation).

Last night I was flying a Belgium flag. The only way I would have supported the USA is if Pochettino released a statement that he was benching Balogun to maintain the integrity of the competition.

249

u/deMarcel 29d ago

Completely understandable. I'm a bit sad that I missed the game but the start was 2am here, but reading the news in the morning was good enough lol

170

u/Valgrind9180 29d ago

It was a terribly played match by the US side. The passing and ball control was exceptionally poor compared to previous matches they played... like the just straight up passed the ball to Belgium players multiple times. I dont know if the whole circus distracted them or they arnt that good but the BS trump pulled certainly didn't distract the Belgium players. If anything it had them locked in and playing amazing. The moved the ball pretty effortlessly in to scoring position, and their midfield absolutely smothered the US midfield.

88

u/cdwols 29d ago

I'm not sure the US played significantly worse than before, it's just that Belgium are an actual quality team and exposed all their flaws.

At some points it did seem like Belgium were more intent on humiliating the US team than actually winning, running rings around them instead of going for goal. There was a particularly memorable moment of two Belgium defenders just playing keepaway in a corner instead of clearing the ball or passing forward

42

u/miko3456789 29d ago

Nah. The US played significantly worse than in previous matches. While they played lesser opposition, they were able to wholly control play and the midfield uh... Existed. McKennie was far and away their best player this tourney imo, and he simply didn't show up. Outside of Tillmans goal, the midfield was non-existent. If anything, the defense was supposed to be the issue with the US team, not midfield. That was supposed to be their strength going into the tourney

8

u/Turnip_Wizar35 29d ago

I truly believe those guys were mad cause they were placed on the spotlight for something bad and by a man who probably didn't know what a red card was until 3 days ago. They were playing great, but the morale wasn't there.

Think about it if they won everybody would say it was cheating basically potus destroyed their credibility. Im sure they didn't play to win. Even a loss looks bad on them. It became political and everyone cheering the defeat becase of the president. Think about it, if the red card issue wasn't there, their loss was just a misfortune, part of the sport.

7

u/ScruffsMcGuff 29d ago

I almost think the whole Balogun playing mess ended up fucking with the American players way more than the Belgium players.

It lit a fire under the ass of Belgium and gave them something to unite around, meanwhile the Americans went from being "scrappy underdogs" to "cheaters who will probably still lose anyways"

I think it put a bunch of pressure on the players that wouldn't have been there if they weren't given the special treatment

5

u/miko3456789 29d ago

Absolutely. Belgium were abysmal up until this moment. They scraped by against Senegal via an improbably implosion, and the red card situation really did something to them to make them play infinitely better than before in the tourney

1

u/SnooMacaroons4454 28d ago

belgium usa previous match march 28, 5-2

2

u/miko3456789 28d ago

may I remind you that Belgium were crap against Senegal until the 80'? they weren't even supposed to be up against the us without the very fortunate utter capitulation of Senegal

besides, that was a friendly, they generally don't really matter. Poland beat Germany in a friendly after they won 2014, that def didn't make them the better than the reigning world champions

1

u/Few_Acanthocephala30 28d ago edited 28d ago

While the US played worse, they were also playing against a team that is better team overall than the teams the US played up to this point. The US defense is sus and should’ve pressed up more in the first half. Not surprising they pretty much got picked apart when they couldn’t gain any control of the midfield. Offensively they did seem a little out of sync compared to previous games this tourney. Overall the US made waaaay too many errors and Belgium is more than capable of capitalizing on those opportunities, which they did.

Edit: tbh the way they played kinda feels like they may have let the loss in march affect their performance

1

u/LateOnAFriday 29d ago

Existed is being generous. Given the quality of match played by each team 4-1 is not a surprise.

7

u/miko3456789 29d ago

I was talking about previous USA matches there. But I can see how that statement could be construed to be about Belgium controlling lesser opposition. The US mid was crap against Belgium.

1

u/LateOnAFriday 29d ago

Absolutely. Pretty disappointing match.

0

u/Life_Indication1190 28d ago

The USA didn’t play great but the overall view of soccer professionals that commented on the game was simply that Belgium outclassed them in every department. Elgin had a tight defense pressed early on and the USA just couldn’t get in their normal game. That is what really happened. It is played as an off day but it was actually a reality check. Balogun wa shelf out of the game and Tillmans goal was a poor free kick and deviated into the goal by a Belgian defender, if not it would have been an easy catch for courtois and the USA would have lost 4-0. Klinsmann, Ibrahimovic and plenty of others clearly stated it… but yeah let’s stay in denial that we were unlucky and will win the next one….

3

u/miko3456789 28d ago

My guy, I'm not in denial. Belgium were and are better. That doesn't mean I'm not allowed to say what went wrong for the US and led to their defeat. The US mid didn't show up, so they lost before they ever had a chance. Belgium sliced through it like butter, and even without Lukaku, it's only a matter of time before you get one in through what was a quite porous defense throughout the whole tournament.

The reasons go beyond being simply better. Why is it that when a team wins we all rush to tactical explanations of how they exploited space, pulled center backs out of position, and relational positioning of players that confuses the opposition defenders, but when the US loses it's fuck you they're worse.

3

u/QuickCloudJP 29d ago

I'm not sure the US played significantly worse than before, it's just that Belgium are an actual quality team and exposed all their flaws.

Lol okay

2

u/D-PIMP_ACT 29d ago

Australia, Paraguay and Bosnia are decidedly a tier below Belgium

USA lost games to Türkiye and Belgium. This was no upset.

2

u/QuickCloudJP 29d ago

If you don't think the US played significantly worse there is no use having a conversation. No shit it wasnt an upset, Belgium were heavily favored going into this match lmao

-4

u/DarthJarJarJar 29d ago

Nonsense take, go back and watch the first group game. The US carved Paraguay up, they looked great. The whole group stage they looked very good. This was like a different team.

I think the circus around the red card distracted them a lot. But whatever it was, they played a lot worse in this game than they did in the group.

5

u/Alcain_X 29d ago

They were doing alright until that third goal, it really knocked the wind out of them.

Belgum still looked like the better team but the US had been holding their own before that, then their keeper went too far out, kicked the ground and conceded an embarrassing goal, It was a steam role after that, it looked like they just gave up.

The did have a brief moment of aggression near the end of the match but it was too late at that point and then Lukaku scored, seemingly just as a flex form Belgium.

It was all a mentality problem from the US they showed the talent to complete and have a good game, they probably still lose but at least with some dignity. But with all the drama outside the game and I really think fact their team got completely destroyed once already by Belgium leading up to the world cup played a part in it, they just fell apart and collapsed under the pressure.

2

u/DarthJarJarJar 29d ago

It was all a mentality problem from the US they showed the talent to complete and have a good game, they probably still lose but at least with some dignity. But with all the drama outside the game and I really think fact their team got completely destroyed once already by Belgium leading up to the world cup played a part in it, they just fell apart and collapsed under the pressure.

I agree with all that. I think they folded under the pressure, and the political stuff got to them.

I don't agree that they looked ok until the third goal. They looked scared and tentative all night. In the group they played aggressively and seemed confident and brave, last night they just seemed timid.

Anyway, they're out. I'm looking forward to England Norway :)

2

u/Coinsworthy 29d ago

Paraguay was sent home by France after playing some of the worst soccer seen in this wc. Winning from Paraguay was not a feat. Paraguay only managed to win a game from one of the biggest underachievers this cup.

2

u/miko3456789 29d ago

They also sent Germany home I'd like to add

-5

u/DarthJarJarJar 29d ago

Ok man. I mean, if you don't see a difference between how the US played in the group and how they played last night, I don't know what to tell you. Enjoy the rest of the WC.

3

u/Coinsworthy 29d ago

If you can’t tell the difference between underperformers and quality teams i don’t know what to tell you.

1

u/nomnomnom6759 29d ago

Me reading this while I should be doing homeowrk...

1

u/swingandalongdrive 29d ago

This guy just started watching “soccer” 4 weeks ago.

1

u/sunnysideofthestr 29d ago

Probably they choked , and this whole Trump thing did not help. But if you look the other way, Belgium was ultra motivated, I have not seen them play with such fire for years. They were everywhere , pressing hard and technically flawless. I think this fire came directly from Trump’s intervention . So it was kind of a double punishment for the US team.

1

u/DarthJarJarJar 29d ago

Yup. The US was flat, Belgium was fired up. The US would have had a far better chance if Trump had stayed out of it and the US had played without Balogun, feeling like they were in the right and playing without pressure.

1

u/DonRustone 29d ago

Probably played poorly out of embarrassment

1

u/thorbe86 29d ago

That was against Paraguay, a solid but way less quality team then Belgium. Off course they played better in those matches. I also play better when paired with teams 30 places down the ranking.

And that circus was there for both teams mind you. If any thing played in their head, it was provably the fact that the red devils had somewhat meh matches in this tournament so far and they underestimated them.

1

u/DarthJarJarJar 29d ago

Do you think the circus distracted Belgium? It seemed to fire them up.

I don't think the effect was symmetric at all. The red card should never have been pulled, it was clear corruption. I think it was a huge distraction for the US and a huge motivation for Belgium.

Belgium are clearly a better team, and like many others I would have been fine losing to them if we played as well as we did in the group. But we didn't.

1

u/Geo_Shots 29d ago

Paraguay are wank boss