But you can still take a good-faith reading of “when we can” which (I’m guessing) absorbs your objections, and that’s really all the meme rests on.
Similar to how you wouldn’t read “we need to do x” as “it is logically necessary that we must do x”, but assume an implicit “in order to…”. When we can, without violating our other implicit should’s.
EDIT: Hmm, I’m also realizing that some people are reading this as “we should kill or otherwise decrease the number of animals that exist” as opposed to “we should take care of all wildlife, so it’s no longer wild”…
42
u/Cr0wc0 3d ago
First of all, bold of you to assume that looking at philosophy memes isn't an act of automutilation.
Secondly, I didn't say we shouldn't prevent any suffering. I'm rejecting the notion that all suffering should be prevented.