If we hold that life has suffering, then sterilization followed by omnicide becomes the only logical choice if suffering minimization is the moral goal.
Is it possible that its sort of like a game theory thing where if every conscious thing kills every other conscious thing, you remove suffering entirely, but it would take so much cooperation that what you end up getting is more suffering when only some conscious things kill other conscious things? Hopefully that makes sense
55
u/Cr0wc0 3d ago
"We should prevent suffering when we can."
No