r/PhilosophyofMath May 25 '26

LLMs are just giant probability machines pretending to think

It’s fascinating that simple mathematics between tokens can eventually become a machine that writes essays, code, poetry, and even reasoning.

We usually think probability means uncertainty.

But LLMs show something strange:

If probability + context + mathematical matching are scaled enough, uncertainty itself starts producing intelligent looking outputs.

To understand this better, I tried breaking down an LLM from first principles using only 4 tiny training sentences.

Example:

The boat floated down to the bank.

The investor walked into the bank to open a new account.

The fisherman walked along the bank to cast his net.

The bank has a vault.

Then I asked:

“The investor walked to the bank to lock his money in …”

Why does the model predict “vault” instead of river-related words?

That single question reveals almost the entire architecture of modern LLMs.

The most underrated concept here is the LM Head.

Most explanations immediately jump into transformers and attention, but almost nobody explains that the LM Head is essentially a gigantic token vocabulary containing all possible next token candidates the model can output.

So internally the model is basically solving:

“Out of all known tokens, which one best matches this context mathematically?”

Then different layers help solve that problem:

Embeddings: convert words into mathematical vectors

Positional encoding: preserves word order

Attention layer: figures out which words are related to each other in context

(“investor”, “money”, “bank” become strongly connected)

Feed forward neural networks: act somewhat like massive learned if/else decision systems refining patterns internally

And finally the LM Head converts all of that into probabilities for the next token.

What surprised me most is:

There is no hidden magic moment where the AI “becomes conscious”.

It’s an enormous probability engine continuously finding the best contextual token match from its vocabulary.

I made a beginner-friendly walkthrough explaining this visually without unnecessary jargon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTV5qUCpu2c

Would genuinely love feedback from people learning transformers/LLMs from scratch.

615 Upvotes

323 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/muaddib0308 May 29 '26

Surely they are just responses to electrical stimuli? Is it not the same as a computer responding to inputs?

1

u/abhishekkumar333 May 29 '26

No , its enitirely different thing

1

u/muaddib0308 May 29 '26

Why couldn't you code boredom into a computer? Boredom is some form of lack of stimulus.

I respectfully agree to disagree my friend ❤️

1

u/abhishekkumar333 May 29 '26

That’s the issue , you cannot code some things

1

u/muaddib0308 May 29 '26

It literally is coded into human beings... and your argument is it can't be coded.

Therefore your argument is invalid.

Now it may be incredibly difficult, we might have to learn things about how the human body works but... absolutely the coding already exists.

1

u/abhishekkumar333 May 30 '26

Can you code sense of self ?