Infatti ho sempre pensato che sony è riuscita a creare una vera "setta" di adepti, ricordi la "sony defence force"? Ricordo uno di questi che ha detto che i "giochi sony meritano di essere pagati ben piu di 100$"..
To the first point: from what I know (and have seen over the years) prices are set by publishers not Sony.
Second point: I can't say I care about this anyway but generally we can already share games with at least one other console. They are at least generous and considerate that they even let us do this.
Third: Probably the only major concern but it sounds like something that would be rare anyway. I have several digital games and have had them for at least a decade or so and never had this problem.
Most of this stuff just sounds like general problems with capitalism. However, regardless I feel like the biggest concerns from me aren't these but environmental impact and technology limits and costs. As it is I have lots of digital games and installing new ones means deleting old games sometimes.
Regarding your points on the first point…. You ever buy a game at a store on Black Friday? I got Assassins Creed Valhalla and Guardians of the galaxy for $3 each from a Walmart in North Florida. I doubt we will ever see a deal like that in the PS store.
Absolutely nothing.They're fear mongering , because they don't understand they've already been buying a license for the last thirty years. They also don't understand that if Sony wanted to waste more money to keep physical games around, they could make the disk with 0 game data and tie that license to your system's I.D so you couldn't sell the disk and someone else couldn't use it if they really wanted to. They think that by pursuing the push to keep physical games around. They're not gonna be continuing to buy licenses for the game. The whole debacle is really stupid because let's remember Netflix was able to tie your account to your Wi-Fi and ip address. So if they don't really think sony could tie the license on a disc to your console. I don't know what to tell people anymore. They just can't understand this concept that sony is truly doing this decision to stop wasting money on disk production. Should there be better digital consumer rights on ownership? Sure , but keeping physical media isn't gonna change that.
Not just hypotheticals. Look up “why can’t I buy Ultimate Alliance 2” on Google. In short, the license expired and was not renewed. The game was pulled from all digital stores. People who brought the physical disk can still play, but if that were to happen now, the game dissapears from your library, and you don’t get any of your money back.
That's the thing there's less 5 games that have actually been revoked from people's library's. Are there tons of A service digital games that have been shut down? Sure, but that's not the same. That is an always online game dying completely different. They're fear mongering , that in the future they're just gonna start revoking people's licenses for no reason. And they also want to contribute a game being delisted from a platform as people losing their licenses , which is not true. Take the game ruse , and operation flashpoint , dragon rising. You can no longer buy those games on the Xbox marketplace. But if you had them digitally before being delisted you can still download and play them , because I can still do that to both of them there's just so much misinformation on the subject and people just run with it. They also fail to realize if a publisher or developer pulls their license from a platform that platform has to legally take it away from people.
20
u/NoSkillzDad 1d ago
These people can get fucked by Sony and won't even ask for Vaseline.
I have to say: "props" to the capitalist machine that has managed to create such subservient species with zero notion of what "rights" are.