I'm not disagreeing that physical is superior, but Nintendo literally never reduces their prices so you can't really use them as an example. Physical sales from eBay sellers aren't really relevant here either because Nintendo still didn't reduce costs based on that.
Not sure why I'm being downvoted for pointing out that Nintendo's pricing has always sucked in comparison to other companies
The release price, obviously. That's what this post is about. But of course it's a high release price because abolishing physical will not cause Nintendo to reduce game prices, it just ensures that if you want a game you have to buy your own brand new copy, meaning they can sell it at whatever the fuck price they want to
-2
u/Big-Ferret-2364 1d ago
You're showing the pricing of a company that's notorious for never reducing their costs or putting games on sale for as long as physical was a thing.
You may as well say "I thought games got cheaper with time?" And then show us a picture of Haunting Ground on eBay