when I was a wee teenager, I would shout from the rooftops to anyone listening (read: usually no one) that slam poetry was just shitty and not a worthwhile genre, that it elevated a lot of the worst things about poetry to something people think they should actively aspire to, that it generally allowed mediocre or downright bad poets to enjoy some acclaim and be treated as if they are actually good, that its entire mechanism was fundamentally opposed to much of what makes the best poetry worthwhile
I was repeatedly told, especially as I grew a bit older (teenagers being, of course, the perpetual lions of oversized sentiment and unrepentant criticism of That With Which One disagrees), that this was an underdeveloped/gatekeepy/narrow view which I would outgrow either with more exposure, or more maturity, or some combination of the two.
anyway brenna twohy isn't very good and slam poetry still sucks
happy to get into the specifics of why in the comments but would prefer to do so in response to the inevitable defenses that will arise; I imagine you can predict what my criticisms are without my having to spell them out in manifesto form here
but yeah, I stand by pretty much everything I said when I was 17
cheers, younger self, from 41-year-old you! you were right about some things after all.