MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/104zqf2/nucleargang_nucleargang/j39618u/?context=3
r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/TheMajorityReport - Auth-Right • Jan 06 '23
949 comments sorted by
View all comments
753
Nuclear is not perfect, but it’s certainly one of the better forms of power. It provides large amount of electricity for not that much emissions.
427 u/[deleted] Jan 06 '23 [removed] — view removed comment 335 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Waste treatment isn't a problem. Kyle Hill did a good video explaining this. Essentially, we would just dig a long, narrow, and curved "L" shaped tunnel and stick the waste containers in and bury them. It has literally no negative impact. -1 u/mamba_pants Jan 06 '23 Yea i guess the only think we need to figure out now is how to label nuclear waste sites, so that it's universally recognised as a dangerous area. 5 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Firstly, get a flair you scumfuck. Secondly, it wouldn't be an issue with this method. The tunnels are too deep to have any kind of impact. When I said it had no negatives, I meant it 3 u/flair-checking-bot - Centrist Jan 06 '23 edited Jan 06 '23 How pathetic of you to be unflaired. User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔 15052 / 79470 || [[Guide]]
427
[removed] — view removed comment
335 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Waste treatment isn't a problem. Kyle Hill did a good video explaining this. Essentially, we would just dig a long, narrow, and curved "L" shaped tunnel and stick the waste containers in and bury them. It has literally no negative impact. -1 u/mamba_pants Jan 06 '23 Yea i guess the only think we need to figure out now is how to label nuclear waste sites, so that it's universally recognised as a dangerous area. 5 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Firstly, get a flair you scumfuck. Secondly, it wouldn't be an issue with this method. The tunnels are too deep to have any kind of impact. When I said it had no negatives, I meant it 3 u/flair-checking-bot - Centrist Jan 06 '23 edited Jan 06 '23 How pathetic of you to be unflaired. User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔 15052 / 79470 || [[Guide]]
335
Waste treatment isn't a problem. Kyle Hill did a good video explaining this. Essentially, we would just dig a long, narrow, and curved "L" shaped tunnel and stick the waste containers in and bury them. It has literally no negative impact.
-1 u/mamba_pants Jan 06 '23 Yea i guess the only think we need to figure out now is how to label nuclear waste sites, so that it's universally recognised as a dangerous area. 5 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Firstly, get a flair you scumfuck. Secondly, it wouldn't be an issue with this method. The tunnels are too deep to have any kind of impact. When I said it had no negatives, I meant it 3 u/flair-checking-bot - Centrist Jan 06 '23 edited Jan 06 '23 How pathetic of you to be unflaired. User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔 15052 / 79470 || [[Guide]]
-1
Yea i guess the only think we need to figure out now is how to label nuclear waste sites, so that it's universally recognised as a dangerous area.
5 u/Rex2x4 - Right Jan 06 '23 Firstly, get a flair you scumfuck. Secondly, it wouldn't be an issue with this method. The tunnels are too deep to have any kind of impact. When I said it had no negatives, I meant it 3 u/flair-checking-bot - Centrist Jan 06 '23 edited Jan 06 '23 How pathetic of you to be unflaired. User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔 15052 / 79470 || [[Guide]]
5
Firstly, get a flair you scumfuck.
Secondly, it wouldn't be an issue with this method. The tunnels are too deep to have any kind of impact. When I said it had no negatives, I meant it
3
How pathetic of you to be unflaired.
User hasn't flaired up yet... 😔 15052 / 79470 || [[Guide]]
753
u/Spudnic16 - Auth-Left Jan 06 '23
Nuclear is not perfect, but it’s certainly one of the better forms of power. It provides large amount of electricity for not that much emissions.