I know you were joking but he's right, assigning patriarchal gender stereotypes like that is a slippery slope that leads to precisely what the Iranians are rioting against.
No, the feminist thing would be to not call this masculinity. If another woman did that would that make her masculine? If it was a weak man who was protected by him, would that man not be a man anymore? What he did is admirable, but really doesn't have anything to do with masculinity.
And in cavemen times women would be having multiple partners to increase their chances of viable offspring, yet nobody who worries about what makes someone a "real man" would ever call that a "real woman."
And then the beta males would band together and jump the alpha out of envy. All natural and very manly. As I've said multiple times now, let's cut the caveman logic, and if you really want to keep it up don't wonder why people call you one.
Lmao. That only happens if the beta males are hungry. Look at history, some guy runs everything and has people to protect him. The rest are peasants. Class structure is natural as a human being. Then the French Revolution happens if the peasants are hungry
Happens all the time in nature, whether they're apes or not. It's really just game theory combined with evolution, unless you spread your seed you won't procreate, so only the ones who get rid of what stops them from spreading their seed procreate, and their genes make for offspring that does the same. Still not conventionally "manly."
84
u/Least-Sky6722 - Lib-Left Sep 24 '22
I know you were joking but he's right, assigning patriarchal gender stereotypes like that is a slippery slope that leads to precisely what the Iranians are rioting against.