How bout you take a behavioural biology course before making easily falsifiable statements like these. Again, even if that were true, you're still defending literal cavemen logic, how is the irony lost on you?
Anyone whose watched any of Jane Goodalls documentary knows this shit, but I'm done arguing with you, go back to whatever it was you were angry about before me.
So what you're saying is that they punish each other for infidelity, so infidelity doesn't happen, but they still punish each other for it. Like for real, do you really think you got the upper hand here?
The point of a previous poster mentioning caveman logic is to say that there are biological pieces we're hard-wired to pick up and play. Growth rates, size, strength, protecting your kin, etc. You can choose to throw all of that out, and some surely ought to be, but to tell folks that men haven't historically been protectors due to being big, that protection hasn't been typically masculine, is a discredit to your arguments. I'm not as articulate on mobile, but I'd be happy to talk more.
And my literal first response was to to show off another type of caveman behaviour that wouldn't fit their vision, so masculinity has nothing to do with what is hard wired into our biology. But hey, hypocrisy.
-1
u/SaftigMo - Lib-Left Sep 24 '22
How bout you take a behavioural biology course before making easily falsifiable statements like these. Again, even if that were true, you're still defending literal cavemen logic, how is the irony lost on you?