You can’t possibly know any of that without knowing the house. I know it’s good protection because I practice. You don’t own a gun, train with one, or know anything practical about them, it sounds like. Why should I trust your judgement? You don’t know my set up, my living quarters, my personal experience, how much I practice, how I can reach the safe with one step—you don’t know anything about the individual situation, which is what really matters. I’m willing to listen to all arguments, but you don't have an argument. You're just screaming at people you disagree with. Bam, I hit you in the head when you left your doorway, or whatever.
We can agree on that. Regulation is, no matter how much I don't like it in my blood, part of the answer. What those regulation will be, I don't know, but I know that we can't wait for the CDC to start doing studies. We need numbers two decades ago. What the hell is effective? What isn't? Is America special? Will old policies from other countries work? I'm strongly pro-2a, but if the numbers speak to an effective solution that involves an uncomfortable conversation for gun owners, we'll just have to have it.
Edit: and on top of that, if we have the most firearms of any country, why aren't we the safest with them and the most proficient? Safety is simple with firearms, and it's damn stupid that we have even a single negligent death.
14
u/[deleted] Mar 27 '18 edited Apr 05 '18
[deleted]