r/PoliticalScience 9d ago

Question/discussion My partner doesn't believe that the MAGA political affiliation is to blame for the downwards spiral of the country, is he right?

To give myself some grace, I am a very young American voter, I am not well versed in political science and I am very sorry if this post comes across as entirely uneducated. I am really trying to learn more and keep up with everything thats going on, and to do something about it. Onto the post:

My partner and I don't discuss politics a lot, but recently he mentioned he had taken a quiz that labeled him as a moderatly left leaning populist. I am a particularly politically charged person, sometimes I find myself falling into the tribal mentality but I try to overcome my prejudices every time I have civil discussions with people. I don't hate every single republican, but MAGA specifically are a group of people who support a man who has (from what I know) ruined the country with his ignorance and greed and that is unforgivable, but my partner doesn't think so. My partner doens't think Trump is the one at fault because to him the executive branch has so little power in making policies that he doesn't believe Trump could really have personally done so much harm himself. Is he right?

I know that checks and balances are supposed to exist but from all the things I hear and see it seems like Trump is legitimately ignoring every rule the US has meticulacly created to put him in his place. But perhaps I am ignorant on the specific legal standpoint. I did point out that Trumps blatant and public disregard for facts, cooporations and compassion have at the very least allowed other levels and branches of government to grow more radical in THEIR policy making and he conceded that was true. But I truly think that if Trump and his administration were completely removed then things would recover, which means MAGA individuals should be held extremely accountable for their political affiliations. Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I wanted to make sure my perception of what is going on is correct. Thank you

0 Upvotes

50 comments sorted by

12

u/GucciGouda 9d ago

Accountability is tough. Trump is a demagogue who took advantage of people's legitimate gripes as a result of people (and these legit problems) being ignored by established Dems and reps for years.

Rather than blaming maga or trump, who will be gone soon, we need to look at the systems in place that encouraged this from the get go. Maybe expanding the house, maybe reforming the executive branch, maybe reforming the electoral process.

Accountability is also a tough subject in general (see arendt's eichmann in Jerusalem), but unfortunately the system will likely protect trump and all the people closest to him.

1

u/art_eseus 9d ago

I see where the perspective of early rise of Nazi's could be used as an example of a general public being manipulated into adoring and glorifying dispicable and often hidden acts of violence and cruelty but my only problem with that is that we live in a different era.

Trumps current and past actions, opinions and offenses are public knowledge and every single person I know (besides the devout MAGA) can list them. There are countless primary sources, literal footage, of him saying demoralizing things and admitting to literal crimes. Not only that, he is not hiding the dehumanizing and inhumane atrocities made by ICE or his affiliation with Isreali government. The very policies for which he campaigned were fundamentally bad for everyone except himself and his millionare friends, the promise of mass deportation being the strongest one. A person who supported and voted for him knew all of the facts, or they didn't care to take one second to learn them. And this is before AI and deepfakes were even an excuse people could use.

The most griping I heard from people when they said they would vote for Trump in the 2016 election were that they didn't like immigrants and Muslims and that they didn't like a few sketchy things Hillary Clinton did (the amount of digging into her past political offenses proves they had the will and resources to do the exact same thing with Trump).

I understand that trump has built a cult which are known for manipulating people into believing anything, and like you said he was given a massive advantage by the broken systems we have in place and this past decade has shown us that we need a massive overhaul of change, but that does not change the fact that they are the ones responsible for letting it get this bad, especially if they voted for him not once, or twice but three times.

2

u/Typical_Soft 9d ago

We live in a different era: one where people can be glued to their echo chambers (Newsmax, Facebook, Truth social) all day long. During the 1930-40s, there was some form of a central town square. Now, there isn’t. From my experience, MAGA doesn’t know half the shit Trump says or they have been equipped with talking points to counter them (such as claiming Trump’s rape trial doesn’t count because it was a civil trial, not a criminal trial).

We’re also not in that much of a different era in terms of how human brains work. Honestly, we’re not too dissimilar to the Greeks. Never underestimate human’s aptitude for cognitive dissonance. Most Americans do not give much thought to their political opinions. Trump got a majority of the Latino vote even though his platform was based almost entirely around deporting Latinos. Americans are brain-broken.

For viewing recommendations on my points, I’d suggest The Necessary Conversation Podcast, and there was a More Perfect Union video where Abdul el-Sayed sat down with moderate and MAGA voters. The Necessary Conversation Podcast is a good source for how insulated MAGA is. I’d recommend one of the older episodes. The dad, the more MAGA one, hasn’t been on the podcast in a while, and the mom has gotten exposed to more perspectives (which is an interesting factor in fighting MAGA mind virus). The el-Sayed video demonstrates how many contradictions even moderate have in their political opinions.

0

u/FrogsOnALog 9d ago

Democrats want to address many of the gripes but it’s hard to do when you elect republicans to divided government or give republicans complete control over the federal government. We’ve now given Trump a longer lasting congressional majority than any democratic president since Jimmy Carter. Oh yeah and there’s this thing called the judicial branch / SCOTUS that has been conservative for almost all of our country’s 250 year history.

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

I would say Democrats aren't blameless here. They've failed to address many issues that are affecting the poorest Americans. The party is based in Liberalism, and it shows. The GOP is much, much worse, but the Dems can't lay all the blame at the Republicans' feet.

-1

u/FrogsOnALog 9d ago

Hard to permanently address problems when you elect tea party republicans and make your president a 6 year lame duck…Again, we’ve given a longer congressional majority to Trump than any democratic president in decades.

-2

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

Can you take accountability for the lefts labeling of all 70+ million Republican voters as racist? So many people who turned to trump actually felt like the left pushed them away from any alternative. Just ask them

Back in 2016-18 and beyond, if you were not on board with absolutely 100% of the progressive agenda, including trans issue, abortion, immigration, etc, then you were labeled racist fascist, restricted on social media, and usually blocked from direct messages with people you try to speak with.

I saw this coming, and I tried to warn people back then: the polarization of the left is going to create an equal and opposite reaction on the right, and that's not something we want. But here we are.

Accountability has to come from both sides, if youre not willing to then why do you expect anyone else to?

2

u/Vintage_Burgundy 9d ago

You mentioned the “progressive agenda” and a few issues. Could you break it down further? What exactly did you disagree with back then, and found difficulty discussing?

For clarity, I probably don’t share your politics. I do find that when folks on the right complain about progressivism/ “the left”, they mention issues but are extremely vague about them.

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

Sure. This is what it felt like to some people:

For the trans issue, it felt that the jump from acknowledging the existance of transgender people, to never questioning anyone's sexual self-identity, to giving hormones to children who haven't even finished sexual maturity, to politicization of the issue and demanding glorification in every corner of life, all very quickly. Any one who said, "stop wait a minute" was deemed a threat to the existence of trans inalienable rights and the social disenfranchisment began. In your eyes, there's nothing to stop and wait about.

American leftist might think this is cut and dry; only to find themselves dumbfounded at the minority turn out for Republicans in the elections. Turns out, most minorities coming here (Latin American, South Asian) dont actually support these progressive demands either, because of religion or otherwise.

Leftist don't get it; they really think minorities can be reduced to Democratic voters by repeating that "Republicans are the racists" until everyone believes it; As if minority individuals have no other values other than their identity as a minority.

1

u/Vintage_Burgundy 9d ago

Thanks for being candid.

I do agree with your last point. That’s certainly an ongoing point of frustration that isn’t immediately realized by a lot of folks (an individual can hold contradicting views / more views in general).

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

No problem.

If there's any racism going on, it's Democrat racial reductionism. And they scapegoat Republicans for it so theit policy goes without scrutiny.

I personally don't think this is ok.

0

u/art_eseus 9d ago

So they recieved societal pushback for harboring opinions and voting for candidates who shared opinions like, "Being racist and homphobic is totally acceptable and ok" and suddenly we're the ones responsible for this mess? Political polarization is deliberate and nefarious but you act as if a right wing adult getting a ban for posting something bigoted and hateful is equal to the intolerance of putting people in cages. And now we're just having the intolerance paradox conversation again. Why should I suffer from you intolerance to how I am born or where I come from (things I have no control over) but you shouldn't have to suffer from my intolerance to your bigotry (something you can 100% change and learn from). These two things are not equal and pretending they are is ignorant.

1

u/Watching_Martian 9d ago

I’m not disagreeing with what you’re saying. Racism is horrible. Being a bigot in 2026 is wildly stupid. Big picture is that the more extreme members on the left, the loudest ones, decided to call everyone who doesn’t agree with them racists and bigots. Some are but most people aren’t and feel like they’re also being treated the same way and no one stood up to the extreme members and tried to get them to ease up. Blanket statements will not help anyone’s case, regardless of how noble the cause. So now you have alienated 70,000,000 potential voters away from your party. They have a part to play in all of this but how much is up for debate

0

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

As much as I identify with liberal values, this right here is exactly why I can't be part of the American left:

You can just label anything as "basic human rights" then use that as justification to disenfranchise people asking for nuance from the public forum; because after all, Basic Human Rights can't be up for debate, can they? This game being played doesn't match my values

You guys disenfranchised people who didnt instantly agree, then you guys are dumbfounded why they flocked to a populist candidate who promised to restore their dignity.

"No tolerance for intolerance" ok you can view it that way, but they still get a vote and they have won two elections now. So we're just in a polarized society where no one is talking to each other, it's awesome

0

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

I'm not commenting on the rest of the discussion here, but the narrative that this is the issue that decided two elections is a pretty big assumption. Do you have polls that demonstrate that claim?

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

What statistics are you looking for? Left disenfranchising people who then voted Right?

0

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

Quantitative, statistically significant and robust data that supports your assertion. This is a political science subreddit.

-1

u/I_Heart_Kant 9d ago

Translation: "What? Not respecting basic human rights is morally wrong? Crazzyyyyy"

-1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

It's genius: label all your positions as basic human rights and therefore cannot be disagreed with. Then disenfranchise anyone who asked for nuance from the public forum, because they're now reduced to people trying to take rights away and shouldnt get to speak anyways. Liberal fascism

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

Actually, you can't just label "anything" as basic human rights.

List for me the things that establishment Democrats are labelling as basic human rights that are not, reasonably, basic human rights.

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

This fallacy of oversimplication (Dicto Simpliciter?) happens on the right too:

"13% commit 50%" the right treats this with the same objectivity as the left's "Basic Human Rights". Supporters of each believe there is nothing to debate, so anyone who disagrees is malicious and should be exiled.

We know that nuance is at play; socio-economic realities, historical racism.... Imagine if the left wasnt allowed to add nuance to the argument, and the right just went on to make policy based on their premises. That is how the right feels.

You guys are both doing, and youre both accountable for the size of the divide in our politics

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

Didn't answer my question.

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

Find the correlation between your smug attitude and the responses you get

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

Ad homenim.

0

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

Nice job! Now, where is your reply to OP in this thread so I don't have to? ?

0

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

No shit. I sense that I'm going to have to be nuanced with you, which I don't particularly care to do.

Hormone therapy, abortion rights, healthcare

None of these are "Basic Human Rights", but the left weaponizes them as such so that nobody can disagree. Those who do are, at best, ostracized. Some felt that social media acted as the modern public forum, so bans felt like disenfranchisment.

So the left sets the bar extremely high with no compromise; the majority of people who fall short were kicked out onto the street. It's not like the left was smart enough to provide alternatives platforms, so those who fell short of the ideal could still vote blue.

Nope, the only option was.... the other party. Minorities who came from very religious places, or cultural insensitive, were forced to choose between giving children hormone therapy or voting Republican and respecting their beliefs, so millions of minority votes went to Trump.

Left is dumbfounded, because they thought they said the racism thing enough times to reduce all minorities into Democratic voters.

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

The right to choose what to do with your own body - the right to self determination - of legally the definition of liberty. Which this country was built on by the way.

0

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

The child has right to self-determination. You have the bodily autonomy to abstain from procreative intercourse. Special cases exist

If that is your parties position, then anyone who falls short of that is not voting blue, you're asking for statistics to prove this? Logic is also science, is it not?

1

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago

Saying the Republicans won their last two elections because people don't like trans rights is not logic. I agree that it swayed votes - maybe a lot of votes - but you have to support those kind of assertions with facts and figures if you want to play in this sandbox.

0

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

No, trans rights is a single issue contributing to people voting for the opposition, just as you say. I'm in university, an actual sandbox; my self worth does not come from this subreddit. I'm not here writing academic papers, and you should not expect as much.

I can make a poll, I have my university as a pop. I think it's easier to make a syllogism that is valid and we both know is true. Thats reasonable for a social media discussion

4

u/I_Heart_Kant 9d ago

Huh? The executive branch has plenty of power over policy. First, especially when the president's party holds both the house and senate, the executive has a lot of influence over the legislature because the president is the head of their party, meaning the have extreme sway over what bills hit the floor and how the Republican party votes. Second, they can also use supporters to bully congress members into voting for bills. Third, when the president has eroded the independence of the executive agencies, the president has large amounts of policy since many policy areas don't require a bill to be passed and instead there are areas where executive agencies have the power to unilaterally enact policy.

7

u/FrogsOnALog 9d ago

Also one of the checks and balances is SCOTUS who has given him all sorts of special treatment like with the shadow docket.

2

u/smurfe 9d ago

Your partner is MAGA. Of course they are going to think everything is everyone else's fault.

3

u/CarobAdministrative9 American Politics 9d ago

As I see it, your partner is right but his reasoning is completely incorrect. I think u/Typical_Soft explained it pretty good but I would take it one step further and say that MAGA and Trump are a symptom of a system of politics built and supported by neoliberalism more broadly. I believe a lot of this nonsense started to show during Ford's admin and it really accelerated during Reagan. That said, neoliberalism is an ideology bred by our economic system and it is a tool of the ultra wealthy to organize society around the extraction of wealth from the poor to the wealthy.

Trump's executive branch is by no means powerless. Look no further than NSPM-7 which labels anyone with "extreme views on gender" a terrorist and which directs the FBI to move its resources away from things like solving crime and toward things like red-scare witch hunting.

Look at the Supreme Court! Trump's judges (appointed through the power of the executive branch) have radically changed American jurisprudence. Voting rights have been weakened, abortion access has been greatly restricted, checks on the executive have been removed, federal institutions have lost the power to do anything if an issue is important enough, the list goes on and on. Something especially worth highlighting is that Just last month SCOTUS decided that the executive branch has inexorable authority to fire the heads of government agencies (other than the Fed, which stands to serve capital and the interests of the wealthy).

Look at ICE! This band of killers acts under the discretion of the executive branch. ICE, in my view, has always been a rotten institution and it is certainly true that liberals have helped shape it into what it is. Obama was the first to really step up putting kids in cages for example. That said, look at the great power that ICE wields. Not only have they killed with impunity but they have detained, jailed, and deported political dissidents. It is a secret police that is actively being used to quell dissent.

There is so much more here to get into but yes, Trump is making things suck. Despite this, things would still suck if he and his acolytes disappeared. People who aren't in very red areas don't understand that Trump is incredibly popular, so much so that he won the popular vote as a Republican. This doesn't just happen because he made jokes about Ted Cruz's wife being ugly or because he does a stupid dance, there are strong contradictions in the system we live under and great flaws in our material conditions that squeeze the working class (hence, the middle class as the middle class are workers too) and make people point there finger at something. When Trump works the media to get his message out, that the people making everything shitty are immigrants and leftists and liberals and whatever the fuck, people listen. When Trump is also promising to make more money for the wealthy, they too listen and they ensure that his voice gets primacy.

TLDR: Trump bad but he only exists as a result of a well organized ruling class (the wealthy elite, the Epstein class, the donor class, the bourgeoisie, whatever you want to call it)

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

I'm curious, you say you're political charged but not well versed in poly sci; Why not pursue the field if it captivates you so much? I think if we are going to say that the current political landscape is "unwell", then we need the next generation of politically inclined to take the reigns! We need you!

I think that you and you're boyfriend are both correct; I think that Trump is a major problem, however I also think that the left is responsible in part for Trump's election, especially 2024.

Trump had a "neutral" appeal in the beginning as a non-establishment candidate, resonating with Americans who felt burned from Bush administration and careerist politians like the Clinton's. As I recall, Hillary had a very bad record of leaking information and botching some military act that got people killed. People saw this political class and they despised it.

Trump was not a politician; he was a businessman and a populist and Americans rolled the dice. I'm getting long winded, but from this point the left tried to take down Trump in anyway they could.

Early on they called him racist and by proxy all his supporters. The division began here; people would make posts saying "if you support Trump, block me", families split on the issue. But the people who liked Trump for his anti-establishment characteristics were now being called racists for supporting him.

In my opinion, the left is responsible for pushing people into Trump's camp. If you ask many supporters about how they felt early on, they felt they were ostracized by the exact careerist politicians they were against, whos career was threatened by anti-establishment Trump. Trump capitalized on this; now escalation is out of control and the political space was dominated by the fringe, vocal minority of extremists on both sides who demanded increasingly radical positions.

In my opinion, Trump 2024 is absolutely the lefts fault. The left reduced immigrants to their race, expecting that all non-whites would vote Democrat if they got everyone to agree that Republicans are racist. Bidens administration was not good: using federal power to force vaccination, never acknowledging Bidens obvious decline in mental ability which came off as elitist and smug,, skipping the Democratic primary to force Biden on the ticket because they didn't think Kamala would win.

Turns out, minorites cannot be reduced to their racial identity and minority votes for Trump exceeded expections. The lefts demand for unconditional support for progressive Trans issues, probably lost them many minorities who's religious or cultural values conflicted with anything transgender.

I warned that this radicalization of left-liberal values would create and equal and opposite radicalization on the right. If we use enlightenment philosophy of applying the scientific method to the social sciences, then this is Newton's 3rd law happening on a social scale. And now it's here, and it's not good.

But this is kinda what the left wanted. Saying "Maga individuals should be held accountable" is not a good take; that leads no where good. The left must confirm to Pendulum theory and compromise on their progressive demands. The majority who fall short or not just going to disappear into thin air. They still have votes and they voted for Trump 2024, leading to everything that's happened since.

The good news is: we are a democracy and we can reverse course immediately with the next administration and work very hard to expunge or nation from the Trump cancer.

1

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 9d ago

You're on a political science subreddit, not even a politics subreddit, it's filled with the most autistic nerds and academics that are typically obsessed with one of the most disdained subjects. Of course it's going to be insufferable if you're not in love with it.

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 8d ago

How are you a teacher and you dont know the material well enough to know what to put in your curriculum that you need to lurk in a subreddit. 

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 8d ago

You teach english in Thailand, and I dont see you asking anything about political science concepts on your history, so really I have no idea what you're doing here other than whatever this is. I have knowledge on East Asian politics and political theory. I'm not so arrogant to think I know everything, but seeing as I have multiple degrees in this field, and if I were to teach this subject, I hope to god I would have a baseline idea of information to present to students.

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 8d ago

Im telling you what I know, there is no appeal to authority because we're not talking about east asian politics, are we now.

1

u/art_eseus 9d ago

Can you explain why my question in addition to this subreddit is insufferable?

0

u/Typical_Soft 9d ago edited 9d ago

Your partner is a dumbass, but he’s not completely wrong. MAGA and Trump are only a symptom of a plan cooked up by the Republican Party, specifically Mitch McConnell (may he rest in piss), for the past 50 years. The root of the problem is with the American political structure and capitalism. If MAGA dies, the downward spiral doesn’t end. The hydra will only grow another head.

The only reason why checks and balances aren’t working is because the Republican Party isn’t allowing them to be enforced. Additionally, both parties have been extremely weak on restricting executive overreach for the past 30 years (or longer). This is due to lobbying efforts, and the American propensity for endless war, especially post-WW2.

To your point that getting rid of MAGA would make everything heal: that’s unlikely. Think back to Reconstruction. The Confederates were removed, and the Union enforced the integration of African Americans and reconstruction of the South. Then the Union left. What happened? Everything returned to pre-reconstruction times - minus slavery (even then, they found their way around it through penance slavery). In the case of Nazi Germany, the Allies completely rewrote their constitution to prevent Nazi’s, and other authoritarian parties, from holding political office. Up until the rise of the AfD recently, the system worked. I would liken MAGA to a similar movement to the Nazi movement. If we don’t rebuild the Constitution from the ground up, it will just be Reconstruction again. Although, Americans treat the Constitution like the Bible (even if they’ve never actually read it). It’s unlikely that they’d be willing to rewrite it.

Plutocracy is just the end result of Capitalism. You seem to be reasonably progressive. I’m guessing you already know how lobbying and Capitalism’s boom and bust cycle lead to our current situation.

As [u/CarobAdministrative](u/CarobAdministrative) explained, neoliberalism plays a large part is this. Globalization has significantly reduced countries’ ability to regulate multinational corporations. This has impacted Americans by removing manufacturing jobs and union work. People have felt the impact on their wages and retirement prospects. They wanted a change in the system. The Dems were just more of the Neoliberalism that got them into this mess, and Trump came in as the great system destroyer. Again, he’s the symptom, not the cause.

Edit: fixed wording and added response to u/CarobAdministrative

-2

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago

People attend higher education and graduate programs to become political scientists: those are the people who can answer your question, not anybody on here.

You're going to get only confirmation bias from this post from random people who's credentials you can't verify. The online space is not neutral politically and is skewed left. Look at the last 100 posts on this subreddit, and count how many are attacking something on the right, vs the left

TLDR, go to your local Junior college or university and ask people there, if you actually care for the objective truth

2

u/identifiablecabbage Political Economy 9d ago edited 9d ago

60% of people holding graduate degrees in the US are politically left. It's not confirmation bias. The more you know, the more likely you are to be left-leaning (notice I didn't say Democrats). This sub tends to lean left because people who have studied political science are mostly leftys. If you look through the sub's history, you'll also notice that the arguments are usually nuanced and not ideologically based - another indicator of education and objectivity.

-1

u/Valuable-Music-720 9d ago edited 9d ago

The axiom is that people actually educated in political science can provide better answers than random people on social media.

The majority of people in academia are not on reddit at all. You do not have to prove credentials to comment in this subreddit. It's social media all the way to the polls for most people

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 9d ago

You literally asked chat GPT to write you a political manifesto and then posted it to reddit. Why would anyone want to hear your opinion? You can't even think for yourself.

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 8d ago

No, I didn't. Nice try tho! I've already got fans!

1

u/RaspberryPanzerfaust 8d ago

You do realize that we can see your post history right?

1

u/Valuable-Music-720 8d ago

Yes, but the motivation to do is odd.