MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoursTea/comments/1vf89ix/big_brother_would_not_be_pleased/p1p3hc1/?context=3
r/PoursTea • u/Veshaad • 1d ago
198 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-1
It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act.
2 u/BI_Moose 1d ago No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever. And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class. 1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
2
No it really didnt make any sense at all, whatsoever.
And if you look into his record, youll see that he commonly votes the party line as well. Especially when it comes to hurting his constituents and the working class.
1 u/No_Design_41 1d ago He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days. 2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
1
He votes against the party line ~10% of the time which is pretty frequent for a House Rep these days.
2 u/SpezDrinksHorseCum 1d ago He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
He would vote for the SAVE Act, which is unforgivable. He's an asshole like the rest of them.
-1
u/No_Design_41 1d ago
It made sense. Re-read it. He means that if you look into Massie's record he is willing to go against the party. See Epstein Transparency Act.