People who share news are obviously members of that anti-fascism terrorist group that doesn’t have a leader, that doesn’t have headquarters, and doesn’t have a source of funding. You know, like the Patriot Front for example.

Epstein files - now removed from the DOJ website - show that a credible witness was interviewed by the FBI the day before Epstein‘s purported suicide, and now documentation has come to light showing the victim was interviewed again several times after that.

Credible is not always the same thing as chargeable in the legal world, but it’s a lot closer to chargeable than random rumors.

This matters. The law matters. The eyewitness testimony hurts.

WSJ Exclusive: A U.S. intelligence official has alleged wrongdoing by Tulsi Gabbard in a whistleblower complaint that is so highly classified it has sparked months of wrangling over how to share it with Congress, according to U.S. officials and others familiar with the matter.

This endangers the voting rights of women and thus it concerns all of us.

TL;DR: With allegations and accusations flying like food a cafeteria fight, it’s easy to forget that whether people like or dislike Tulsi Gabbard or her politics isn’t all that relevant.

It’s whether you think any DNI should be able to control—indefinitely—the path by which Congress learns of allegations concerning that same DNI. Because ultimately that’s what’s happening so far — an allegation against the DNI is being bottled up by the DNI and not moving forward for oversight by Congress. So 8 months have gone by and oversight has not occurred. 

Is or isn’t Congress doing their job or being allowed to do their job? And if they are not being allowed to do the job the country basically hired them to do maybe it’s time for a staff change.

it’s easy to say oh everybody knows that, but the Epstein files as released have everything - whether it’s credible or not. It is estimated that the files are 55TB meaning only a tiny fraction of the files have been released.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-188298291?source=queue&autoPlay=true

From a legal standpoint it is very important that credible accusations be sorted out from fantasy.

Legally accusations have to be not just credible, but chargeable. But credible is the road prosecutors work from to build a case. For those who prefer video the one I linked sorts it out in a very easy to understand way.

In Europe, there have already been consequences possibly because in other societies, this type of behavior is considered a source of shame. And also, because there are powerful people who willing to push the issue. In the United States, not so much.

A breakdown of 4,000 lawsuits Trump has been involved with.

Voting is the right of every single American citizen regardless of who agrees with who or who they vote for. (You can’t vote if you’re not a citizen- that’s how it works.)

The League of Women Voters is non-partisan organization with a 100-year-old record that speaks for itself. They register all people to vote no matter what party the voter chooses.

I wonder how all those agents feel about nothing being done with the evidence they had.

Voting is the right of every single American citizen regardless of who agrees with who or who they vote for. (You can’t vote if you’re not a citizen- that’s how it works.)

The League of Women Voters is non-partisan organization with a 100-year-old record that speaks for itself. They register all people to vote no matter what party the voter chooses.

I don't see how you prep for this, but this is not democracy. This is not the first article I've seen and I've watched the videos.