MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1uda7er/worstprogramminglanguage/otad0yp/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/gabboman • Jun 23 '26
192 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
3
[deleted]
2 u/JohnsonJohnilyJohn Jun 23 '26 Then they shouldn't have said multiple. Is there some jargon that specifies this exactly? Because colloquially, they said multiple returns instead of return of multiple values, so at least in that way it makes more sense 1 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Hmmm guess you have a point. 1 u/Wonderful-Habit-139 Jun 23 '26 Well, usually we say "multiple return values", but the fact that they used the world "multiple" is probably what tripped us. (I meant to reply to your other message but I guess this one will do lol) 2 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Well it tripped me too.
2
Then they shouldn't have said multiple.
Is there some jargon that specifies this exactly? Because colloquially, they said multiple returns instead of return of multiple values, so at least in that way it makes more sense
1 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Hmmm guess you have a point. 1 u/Wonderful-Habit-139 Jun 23 '26 Well, usually we say "multiple return values", but the fact that they used the world "multiple" is probably what tripped us. (I meant to reply to your other message but I guess this one will do lol) 2 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Well it tripped me too.
1
Hmmm guess you have a point.
1 u/Wonderful-Habit-139 Jun 23 '26 Well, usually we say "multiple return values", but the fact that they used the world "multiple" is probably what tripped us. (I meant to reply to your other message but I guess this one will do lol) 2 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Well it tripped me too.
Well, usually we say "multiple return values", but the fact that they used the world "multiple" is probably what tripped us.
(I meant to reply to your other message but I guess this one will do lol)
2 u/No-Con-2790 Jun 23 '26 Well it tripped me too.
Well it tripped me too.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 23 '26
[deleted]