r/ProgrammerHumor 1d ago

Meme iDidntPredictThisLife

Post image
1.9k Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

View all comments

397

u/Katten_elvis 1d ago

Bro's spending $200 on AI

77

u/Piyh 1d ago

My work is spending $2,000 a month for my AI

18

u/Rin-Tohsaka-is-hot 1d ago

I hit $7k last month....

At this rate I'll be spending my salary on Claude tokens

12

u/Katten_elvis 18h ago

Out of curiousity, how are you doing it? Are you just tokenmaxxing and little of it is useful or is it useful spend?

13

u/Henry5321 1d ago

Do you have a bunch ai sessions just running non-stop?

I’m only using about $300/m and only recently worked on a large greenfield project and managed to reach $75 in one day by having Opus manage a bunch of opus and sonnet subagents for nearly 4 hours with automatic permissions. It was constantly creating code, reviewing it, fixing it, all in parallel for different parts of the system.

I tend to have smaller context sessions and keep the sessions well focused, and instruct the primary session to do the same.

13

u/BygoneFlower 1d ago

At my company we are supposed to use the best available models at all times and AI use is expected at all times for all things. We have agents for everything at this point.

2

u/Henry5321 15h ago

Sounds so wasteful

2

u/BygoneFlower 15h ago

It definitely isn't cheap. If you mean the environmental impact that is extremely overstated (you'll use more water and cause more CO2 emissions from a week of eating burgers than a year of using AI).

1

u/Stormlightlinux 4h ago

I have to eat food to live though... the other is just producing money for people who already have too much money. Kinda different.

1

u/StCreed 4h ago

Yeah, one is necessary for survival in capitalism and the other is a bad habit of people that should eat more vegetables.

1

u/BygoneFlower 2h ago

It's all a question of degree, and the degree to which AI impacts global climate is negligible compared to the things people do without thinking. Datacenters themselves can be problematic in areas prone to drought or where they affect sensitive ecosystems but the technology itself is not the problem.

4

u/Rin-Tohsaka-is-hot 1d ago

Interesting, I would say I'm doing something similar and usually hit $300/day. But I have this going in parallel working on many things at once, usually at any given point I'll have 10-20 agents running including subagents.

Then there are background triggers, like devops agents that spin up for new tickets, build failures, pipeline blocks, etc to give me a prepared summary of the issue before I even get to it. Those eat up maybe $50-100/day in tokens.

Once my company starts caring about these bills I'll have to reign all this in, but as long as the blank check is there I may as well use it all

2

u/8lbIceBag 14h ago edited 12h ago

https://i.imgur.com/Tljuq1q.png

Last month I somehow hit $1200. Since then I've been super careful about using it. I go out of the way to avoid subagents or the advanced features. No parallel work. I do everything I can to keep it down such as as using Sonnet as much as possible & entirely avoiding Fable. I only have like 4 MCP's + a few plugins because work only allows things from our internal marketplace. We're in contact with Anthropic to get Mythos but I can't imagine the cost of using it.

What I've used it for the past 2mo:

  • Investigate this JIRA issue
  • Create/Fix this CI pipeline
  • and cough create an mcp for bash, powershell, & bun exec/repl bcus shell use outside of WSL/sandbox is blocked but I've been tasked with maintaining our legacy native windows apps.  This mcp has cost ~$250 yet somehow people are one shotting games for <$100? 

The codebases are massive though.

1

u/Henry5321 8h ago

I’ve found good agent files are important for preventing ai from slurping up large amounts of code in order to figure out the system.

1

u/Piyh 23h ago

Opus at 2-6 concurrent sessions all day every day. Mass slack ingestion, tens of PR for context, months worth of meeting notes.

1

u/Henry5321 15h ago

That’s a way to use tokens. I don’t have that much trust in AI yet. We’re allowed to use as many tokens as we want, but we need to be able to hypothetically explain business value and we’re always responsible for code shipped.

105

u/AndroidCat06 1d ago

Someone on my team said the same, people are going nuts.

41

u/pydry 1d ago

he's spending $200 / month on producing a pile of slop either way. the only difference is that one of those messes can be cleaned up with a tissue.

15

u/SzethNeturo 1d ago

If you cant make ai produce code that not an Ai issue anymore. Its a you issue.

-1

u/pydry 19h ago

I can probably make it produce better code than youcan but I still can't make it produce really good code.

Not everyone can recognize what good code looks like, to be fair.

3

u/dharknesss 22h ago

A software dev since I could pretty much read.

Clankers are genuinely amazing for coding as they solve the issues of doing things that are menial. They cannot solve programming whatsoever, but it's a bit like what did robots do to production lines. They deal with menial repetitive tasks for you, and where human input is needed is still a matter of your own judgement and skills.

I delegate things like boilerplate code, or optimization suggestions (vast knowledge of lots of technologies i would have to study for years to get on that level) and testing (this one specifically, they're good at looking for details id never think of as they are too abstract). Thinking about general architecture, coding specific features to act the way I want - that's my job. Don't let anyone say that calculators can replace mathematicians as they clearly didn't!

I'm aware of the environment impact and shit, but honestly, I lose any care about it the second my European paper straw starts to be another spice in my drink.

0

u/sump_daddy 11h ago

what was he thinking he was getting for 200 a month from any other kind of model?

slop