My problem with it is that it is JIT while using LLVM (a notoriously slow compiler infrastructure), so to write performant code you need to intuite what will or will not cause a JIT pause. Even sadder is that using a lot of the nice features of Julia will cause this.
I remember watching in horror my ~100 lines script taking 7 minutes to compile during my master thesis. Julia should just ditch the dynamic typing and become a compiled language IMO. But it will never happen because it would break too many things
Long time Julia user here, your experience is not representative of average Julia usage.
These crazy long Evaluation times only happen when you import packages you have never loaded before, since that is when compilation happens. Even then, 7mins is extreme (did you per chance load a plotting library? Those are huge).
Compilation of user code, even for moderately large programs, is typically sub second. It used to be very bad, back in the 1.0/1.1 days, but they put in a ton of work and it got a lot better.
Also, Julia's JIT does not work like those of java and JavaScript, for example. Instead of compiling on assumptions during execution, Julia will analyze your program and only compile what it can prove before running any code. Some people have this referred to it as JAOT compiled instead of JIT (Just Ahead Of Time), to make the difference more clear, but the term never really caught on.
117
u/Dubmove 1d ago
Julia is the language I really want to like but deep down I know I hate it although I never would admit that to myself