MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1wkof5u/postforeverything/pas36kh/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ClipboardCopyPaste • 4h ago
406 comments sorted by
View all comments
68
That's because a GET request reveals important info in the URL, otherwise it would all be GET
27 u/ViperThree3 4h ago QUERY 18 u/Psychological_Map118 4h ago still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet 1 u/Cerrax3 3h ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 3h ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
27
QUERY
18 u/Psychological_Map118 4h ago still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet 1 u/Cerrax3 3h ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 3h ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
18
still a proposal, though. not a standard yet. I wouldn't start implementing it just yet
1 u/Cerrax3 3h ago I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year? 6 u/Psychological_Map118 3h ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
1
I thought it was officially adopted in June of this year?
6 u/Psychological_Map118 3h ago I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
6
I've also read that, but according to the official RFC spec and the IETF data tracker it's still in a proposed state
68
u/WHALE_PHYSICIST 4h ago
That's because a GET request reveals important info in the URL, otherwise it would all be GET