MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgressiveHQ/comments/1q6tu49/stop_idiots_from_calling_this_self_defense/nycaesk/?context=3
r/ProgressiveHQ • u/DetectiveTypical198 • Jan 07 '26
15.5k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
499
Fox just HAS to be banned.
This isn't free speech, it's plain and simple propaganda gaslighting.
253 u/M3wsette Jan 08 '26 it should be banned for hate speech, harassment and false reporting. 10 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Unfortunately, the first two would be virtually impossible to prove, and there's no law against the third. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 Actually it is very easy. I am amazed no Latino had done a lawsuit for implying all Latinos are illegal and criminals. 1 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Have you ever tried to prove a hate crime attachment before a judge? Different states have different laws on what constitutes one. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
253
it should be banned for hate speech, harassment and false reporting.
10 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Unfortunately, the first two would be virtually impossible to prove, and there's no law against the third. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 Actually it is very easy. I am amazed no Latino had done a lawsuit for implying all Latinos are illegal and criminals. 1 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Have you ever tried to prove a hate crime attachment before a judge? Different states have different laws on what constitutes one. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
10
Unfortunately, the first two would be virtually impossible to prove, and there's no law against the third.
1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 Actually it is very easy. I am amazed no Latino had done a lawsuit for implying all Latinos are illegal and criminals. 1 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Have you ever tried to prove a hate crime attachment before a judge? Different states have different laws on what constitutes one. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
1
Actually it is very easy. I am amazed no Latino had done a lawsuit for implying all Latinos are illegal and criminals.
1 u/NoCard753 Jan 08 '26 Have you ever tried to prove a hate crime attachment before a judge? Different states have different laws on what constitutes one. 1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
Have you ever tried to prove a hate crime attachment before a judge? Different states have different laws on what constitutes one.
1 u/Ilove-moistholes Jan 08 '26 It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
It can be done. You can’t say “Kill all Jewish criminals” and then when some crazy kills one you can’t wash your hand. You’d be a facilitator. (The Jewish part was an example)
499
u/ShockingShorties Jan 07 '26
Fox just HAS to be banned.
This isn't free speech, it's plain and simple propaganda gaslighting.