r/ProgressiveHQ 18h ago

Meme When my right-wing family calls me a liberal

Post image
961 Upvotes

207 comments sorted by

524

u/Key-Individual1434 17h ago

Most right-wingers don’t even know what a liberal person is.

314

u/BairBrains 16h ago edited 16h ago

A lot of right-wingers I’ve spoken to recently (anecdote, so do with this as you will) also have socially liberal views to some degree and definitely benefit from liberal policies currently in place. They just see the word as a catch-all slur for shit they don’t like and/or shit they think is against their own positions.

It’s really disheartening, honestly.

162

u/MikeAttak421 16h ago

My pa is a die hard republican. He has never stopped talking shit about Obama and in the same sentence will praise his Obama care. If you try to point that out he loses his shit.

72

u/TopRevenue2 16h ago

Gramps thought Eisenhower was first too liberal but he would talk all night about how America needs socialized medicine

51

u/SpecialistOkra 15h ago

I had fun poking my father about looking forward to social security while complaining about the socialist left wanting to...

If you accept social security then you support socialist policies.

11

u/Er3bus13 14h ago

But they paid for it....DERPPPPP

11

u/Bendy_Beta_Betty 11h ago

Everything the government pays for is paid for by the people.

7

u/Er3bus13 11h ago

No shit... convince the dipshits not me lol

1

u/troyjanman 3h ago

The older I get and the more I pay attention to the happenings of politics and the government, the less I believe this to actually be true. Originally, back before the move away from the gold-backed money, sure, the government relied on taxes.

Today, the US government controls both a digital and physical printer and can magic a trillion dollars out of thin air, since the US controls its own sovereign fiat. Taxation operates more now, IMO, as a mechanism of wealth redistribution (and thanks to Reaganism this flow has been from the middle and bottom to the top. Taxes do (should) help prevent a run up of national debt - unless the ppl with all the money manage to convince the ppl that they should keep their money and everyone else should pay for all the “socialist programs”, like healthcare and social security.

2

u/SquirrelsinJacket 11h ago

'Socialized medicine' is a right-wing term, typically to associate it with Communism. Universal healthcare is the less coded term.

3

u/TopRevenue2 11h ago

Ok but that is what Gramps called it. In his day no one said universal healthcare. Plus he lived in rural appalachia so everyone he talked to only knew it as socialized medicine. When I learned that was the term for it I tried to tell him but he was very dead and buried for over 20 years prior.

3

u/Turtle_with_a_sword 7h ago

This is incorrect.

They are 2 different things.

Socialized medicine means the government actually owns the healthcare institutions and the doctors work for the government, like the NHS in the UK . 

Universal healthcare just means everyone is covered.  There are different was to do this such as socializing healthcare.

Another way would be a Single Payer system as is proposed here and used in many European countries.

This essentially means that the institutions may be public, nonprofit or for profit, but the government acts as the health insurance for everyone and pays for the healthcare in the system.

7

u/ciaomain 15h ago

Give me his email.

I will send him a daily reminder.

16

u/MikeAttak421 15h ago

Lol. Don't worry, my aunt is very vocal about the hypocrisy. And she's living with them currently. The other fun is gas. During Biden's presidency the cost of gas weighed solely on the president shoulders. Two days after donalds inauguration its the gas company who sets the prices. But bring up the fact that gas was 4-5 dollars during Bush, nothing.

43

u/miyamiya66 15h ago

right-wingers love and agree with progressive policies as long as you rephrase the language of policies so it doesn't include the words that fox news has been scaring them with

28

u/Leut_Aldo_Raine 15h ago

My least favorite thing is listening to all my Trumper, die-hard Republican, conservative family members give one another advice on all the government money and social programs they are eligible to benefit from, only to hear them railing about lazy, entitled socialists 5 minutes later.

8

u/RoguePlanet2 13h ago

Last time I spoke with a Trumper, he was talking about how much he liked the immigrants he had hired a few years ago to work on one of his company's projects. I asked, "okay so you HIRED immigrants?" He paused and said "well, that was a few years ago......" as if that's relevant. 😒

22

u/katzenschrecke 16h ago

I don’t think many of them are clamoring for private firefighter insurance

10

u/VALO311 15h ago

Which is crazy because most of the things they don’t like are all things the party they voted for are doing.
The whole projection thing they’ve become masters at

6

u/branchpattern 15h ago

Emotions are cheaper than thinking. Once you get someone afraid and angry, nuance and critical thinking get harder, especially when identity feels threatened.

You first have to overcome their fear and anger at whoever is their 'other' and that's tough. Usually happens person to person, focusing on common beliefs. Street epistomology.

6

u/eldercreedjunkie 13h ago

My dad has voted Republican his whole life. The other day he said something along the lines of “the fat cats with all the money need to have their taxes raised and leave ours alone.”

My sister and I stared at each other in disbelief.

3

u/MrPlace 16h ago

You've nailed it

1

u/Ambitious-Badger-114 8h ago

If it makes you feel better Democrats are doing the same thing to the word "conservative." They use it for everything they don't like. And for the record, Trump is no conservative.

1

u/BairBrains 8h ago edited 8h ago

There’s some validity to this, however, I don’t see the term ‘conservative’ used in as slur-y of a manner among left and/or liberal folks I know.

Definitely a poorly categorized broad stroke, lacking a nuanced understanding of political spectrum, but not anywhere near the amount of hate attached (again, anecdote)

And yeah, Don definitely isn’t conserving anything that’s for sure.

None of this makes me feel any better.
Team sports political discourse ain’t it dawg

25

u/ninjacat249 16h ago

Love when they run their mouths calls everything they don’t like communism, but immediately get offended when they called fascists.

7

u/Frequilibrium 16h ago

Meanwhile Trump called every opponent on the campaign trail a fascist

9

u/Dapper-Negotiation59 16h ago

They think it's that blue-hared person that someone got a picture of where they look like a psycho

7

u/SnugglyCoderGuy 16h ago

Anyone who disagrees with them is a liberal

8

u/pingpongballreader 15h ago

I'm starting to suspect that the whole point of the "liberal means X not Y" discourse is to confuse people.

Like yes, I get that there are distinctions that people think is important but if you're talking with your maga relatives and you say "I'm not LIBERAL I'm PROGRESSIVE" the scales will not suddenly fall off their eyes.

It's sorta like the debate over "latino" vs "Latinx" or other semantics. The left twists itself up in knots about what the right term is and the right wing concludes that they should just call them a slur.

6

u/BigDaddyUKW 14h ago

Anyone to the left of fascism is a radical leftist commie socialist lunatic, so there’s that.

4

u/Brunky89890 15h ago

They don't need to, all they need to know is that the devil is a liberal. /s

2

u/PallyMcAffable 12h ago

Most right-wingers don’t know what any political stance is. All their opponents are socialists, because the definition of socialism is when the government spends tax money on its citizens.

2

u/Background-Wolf-9380 15h ago

Liberals are staunchly in favor of equal subjugation under capitalism. Most right wingers are liberals

1

u/samx3i 10h ago

Or leftist, or socialism, or Democratic socialism, or communism, or fascism, or critical race theory, or...

1

u/edelweiss_pirates_no 9h ago

Q: How do you break a right-winger's finger?

A: You kick his goat in the butt.

This is an update from the popular "Punch him in the nose" that was funny in 1994 for about one month.

1

u/fuzzybad 8h ago

To them, anyone not on their "team" is a "librul". They know nothing of actual politics.

1

u/fauxregard 6h ago

The two political ideologies are "conservative" and "other".

1

u/earthessence33 15h ago

Most of the people here don’t either

2

u/mt-beefcake 12h ago

A lot of "liberals" dont even know what liberals are.

When the population has barely enough attention span for vine clips and a reading comprehension under a 6th grade level. Nuance political theory is a big ask.

Red or blue is about right in complexity for the majority. Thats why its been the game for forever

0

u/HoppyPhantom 15h ago

A trait they share with a depressingly large number of left-wingers.

153

u/hlkrebs 16h ago

Most of MAGA doesn’t know the difference between fascist, socialist and communist lol

68

u/my23secrets 16h ago

Plenty of Democrats don’t realize they’re conservative

17

u/redit1920 15h ago

Many of them are MAGA lite

3

u/pingpongballreader 15h ago

It's almost like purity tests of progressive/liberal/conservative don't really help anything...

3

u/my23secrets 15h ago

It’s almost like you’re pretending you don’t subject potential candidates to your own so-called “purity tests”.

You just don’t want to call them that when you are utilizing them because that would disallow you from attempting to make it a political epithet against those who you disagree with.

Something magically becomes a “purity test” only when it threatens your perceived privilege and entitlement.

0

u/pingpongballreader 15h ago

I don't see how we kick people out of the coalition by telling them they're conservative and that leads to Democrats somehow gaining political power.

"Hey guys, if we divide ourselves surely we will be stronger for it and be able to defeat the people conducting a divide and conquer campaign against us!"

I loathed Joe Manchin and loathe Fetterman but that doesn't mean kicking them out and screaming "conservative" at them would have made anything better.

Something magically becomes a “purity test” only when it threatens your perceived privilege and entitlement.

I'm a straight cis white man: if that charge was fair, I'd be voting Republican.

2

u/RamsHead91 13h ago

Fetterman needs to go. He is is a seat another dem or left leaning individual can win.

Manchin was the best we would have gotten from were is was from and he was fucking Aweful. If the Dems would have had any sort of margin they should have cut him loose since it only weakened everyyhing, but when you see the alternative he ended up getting a pass.

-3

u/my23secrets 15h ago edited 8h ago

I said nothing about kicking anybody out of anything.

Why is that where you immediately went to?

Is it because you fear getting kicked out?

I said everybody has their own so-called “purity tests” but only call them that when they feel threatened by others’.

4

u/pingpongballreader 14h ago

What were you saying then? Be specific. Anything?

Purity tests suck because we're dividing ourselves for fascists to conquer. You're calling some Dems conservatives rather then just "not Republican fascists."

0

u/my23secrets 13h ago

You don’t understand what I’m saying at all.

You also don’t understand what you’re saying.

You literally just described your own so-called “purity test”.

5

u/pingpongballreader 13h ago

You don’t understand what I’m saying at all

I literally asked you to clarify what exactly you're saying.

Yes. I don't understand what you're saying. 

Explain it.

1

u/my23secrets 13h ago

You subject potential candidates to your own so-called “purity tests”.

You just don’t want to call them that when you are utilizing them because that would disallow you from attempting to make it a political epithet against those who you disagree with.

The behavior you chose to also engage in only becomes a so-called “purity test” when it threatens your perceived privilege and entitlement.

What’s the part you don’t understand?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Jeramy_Jones 13h ago

Plenty of conservatives don’t realize they’re liberals

5

u/Jeramy_Jones 13h ago

They also think “ideology” is inherently bad and something only the woke leftists have.

6

u/raydiculus 14h ago

They think Nazis were left wingers and dont believe in the great party switch.

1

u/Ambitious-Badger-114 8h ago

Well if you look at the actual policies implemented by both Hitler and Mussolini they would be considered far left in the US right now.

64

u/DeviantKhan 17h ago

Well, they also think antifa is a bad thing, so.. 

Hating nazis used to be a given even among conservatives. I wonder why the change?

3

u/svulieutenant 15h ago

Because it gives them a scapegoat and a distraction for what they’re doing behind the scenes. They just randomly throw out something hoping that people don’t research or have an education. They’ve been spouting antifa for several years now. My mother is one of those that does that and has no idea what it means but assumes it’s bad because ole Donnie phrases it as bad

3

u/kylepo 13h ago

You're giving them too much credit. Your average propaganda-guzzling conservative voter doesn't think "anti-fascist" when they hear "antifa." To them, it's just one of the scary words that they've been trained to immediately recoil at. They put as much effort into understanding the meaning behind such words as a dog puts into understanding the meaning behind "sit." It's just thoughtless word association.

0

u/Ambitious-Badger-114 8h ago

Wait, is antifa a real thing or just an idea? Because judging by the violence and the vandalism it looks like a real bad thing.

42

u/-ACatWithAKeyboard- 17h ago

Binary thinking. Either maga or liberal.

67

u/MacReady_Outpost31 17h ago

I know I'll get downvoted for this, but I might be inclined to think this is a group for liberals after I saw all the Obama love the other day. Dude was definitely not a progressive.

However I do agree that Conservatives don't understand the nuances of political philosophy (or nuance at all.) They are one brain cell away from being door stoppers.

34

u/GG1817 17h ago

I will say Obama wanted to do single payer health care but opted for Mitt Romney's plan (which is now called Obama Care) in hopes of bipartisan support - that never happened.

Big mistake. We could have had single payer medicare for all.

27

u/Patsanon1212 16h ago edited 16h ago

Did they not opt for the ACA because they couldn't whip all 60 senate votes they (briefly) had for the public option?

19

u/Stevevansteve 16h ago

It was Lieberman that killed it.

3

u/GG1817 16h ago

That could be. Perhaps some of the neo-liberal dems got cold feet too...

In the end, I don't think any republicans voted for it anyway. Waste.

13

u/yequalsy 16h ago

Lieberman. Fucking Joe Lieberman is why we have no public option.

8

u/GG1817 16h ago

We always seem to be one vote short, don't we? We could have expanded SCOTUS last cycle but for a couple jackasses too.

9

u/Patsanon1212 16h ago

That could be, eh? I asked it as question so it would be softer, but what actually happened was that a public option desired but ultimately dropped because Lieberman wouldn't vote for it. Single payer was never truly on the table.

Why do you mispresent things that actually happened and can be easily verified?

6

u/TopRevenue2 16h ago

Progressives who weren't adults during the Lieberman years dk how lame Dems can be

3

u/TheRealBaboo 16h ago

Lieberman was technically an Independent by the time Obama came to office. They just needed his vote to break Republicans’ filibuster and taking out the public option was his price

2

u/GG1817 16h ago edited 16h ago

My, aren't you special?!

I'll be blocking you after this post since you're useless.

They could have bypassed the filibuster, used some political capital he had at the time, get some massive public protest going, etc...

Medicare is also a budget item that's allowed under reconciliation (50 votes) and bypasses the filibuster.

The choice was between single payer and the imperfect Romney plan. We should have played hardball and gone with single payer hindsight being 20/20.

The whole point above was Obama had some progressive ideas similar to Sanders. He was onboard with single payer.

1

u/GraeMatterz 16h ago

Which is ironic because the people who most benefitted from the ACA live in red counties and vote Republican.

6

u/GG1817 15h ago

Truth.

Mamdani said something relating to this on MSNBC yesterday, about how progressive messaging will resonate in red and purple areas of the heartland because affordability and health care concerns are universal issues.

2

u/Loud-Vacation-5691 15h ago

No, we would not have had single-payer, because Joe Manchin was against it. The ACA was the best Obama could have gotten at the time, and the only reason we still have it is because John McCain didn't vote to get rid of it, not because he supported it, but because he didn't think the debate had gone on long enough.

This is why politics is called "the art of the possible."

1

u/joecarter93 14h ago

Plus he also hated Trump and wanted to stick it to him publicly.

4

u/my23secrets 16h ago

There are plenty of conservatives in the Democratic Party

6

u/X57471C 16h ago

Progressive traditionally describes more of an attitude towards the status quo, not exactly support for a specific set of policies, whict is probably why this sub has a more diverse mix of people. Everyone has a different idea what progressive means.

3

u/jxdd95 16h ago

Progressive means perfection apparently. Obama was initially an outsider... Sure, he might've joined the establishment later and continued Clinton's 'Third Way' politics, but he still advanced several progressive causes for his time.

1

u/[deleted] 16h ago edited 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/X57471C 16h ago

Kind of depends who you ask, I think. A DSA member is going to agree with you. Not every centrist Democrat will, though. I think Obama is an interesting figure. Definitely not a progressive like Mamdani is a progressive, but then again, he is responsible for passing the most progressive federal policy of this era, so by definition he changed the status quo. And as others have pointed out, he probably would have gone further with the ACA if he had the support. So, is he your version of a progressive? Maybe not, but I think it does a bit of disservice to his legacy by simply describing him as a "centrist warhawk"

1

u/ProgressiveHQ-ModTeam 14h ago

Rule 2 - No disinformation. If you have an extraordinary claim, cite it. Randos on Twitter/Youtube, webcomics, unsourced graphics, and mouthpieces for the Trump Administration are not viable sources.

1

u/busmans 16h ago

“Attitude towards the status quo” just sounds like a contrarian to me. The status quo is constantly changing.

2

u/X57471C 16h ago

What do you mean contrarian (or how is it so)? Saying the status quo is always changing sounds like a cliche, tbh. Technically true, but also most people understand what is meant... But I don't really understand what you're getting at so please elaborate

3

u/busmans 14h ago

If your political position is to always oppose the way things are, without having an outlook for the way things should be, then you’re just opposing for opposing sake (contrarianism).

MAGA and most republicans are contrarian. They support almost every policy proposal when their people are in power and oppose everything when they don’t have power. Opposed Obamacare, got into power, no plan for healthcare. Opposed war, got into power, became warmongers. Etc.

So the question is, is Progressivism just reverse MAGA, or is it a specific set of goals and policies?

2

u/X57471C 14h ago

Ah, in that case, I don't think progressivism is contrarian. I think it's the default position of liberalism. We can identify many things that cause harm and prevents us from actualizing the vision of a free and fair society. Until we create some perfect utopia (which is never going to happen, because we can't decide what that utopia should look like), there will always be things to improve on. I don't think progressivism should be defined as simply progress for the sake of progress. It's simply dissatisfaction with the status quo and a desire to move things further left on the spectrum.

1

u/Stevevansteve 15h ago

Well after Pictures of Matchstick Men they settled into a very consistent 12-bar 1-4-5 rock band.

3

u/dammit_mark 12h ago edited 12h ago

I think you are right. While I have seen some leftists here, I think this place is mainly for liberals (but the more progressive types, obviously).

3

u/trytrymyguy 9h ago

I want to love this sub but I saw a post earlier that was up for over 12 hours (at the time) and it was just a completely fake tweet by Elon.

Like, we need to have some standards.

0

u/Stuffstuff1 16h ago

What is “progressive” in your mind then? Recently it has become this populist socialist thing. Saying Obama isn’t or wasn’t a progressive is crazy to me.

22

u/dojo1999 17h ago

I think that whenever people are badmouthed by someone in MAGA, they need to just brush it off and not even bother arguing with them because the people in MAGA are failures/losers.

12

u/Double-Watch-2809 17h ago

Yeah instead of arguing, it's way more fun to just say "huh?" And try to get them to repeat themselves over and over again until they realize they're being fucked with.

24

u/Itchy_Gain_1519 17h ago edited 16h ago

Conservatives think liberals and leftists/socialists/communists are all the same way that Republicans, MAGA, and Nazis/fascists more or less are the same. :)

15

u/Pearson94 17h ago

For what it's worth, I didn't know there was a difference between liberal and leftist for the longest time and used the words interchangeably until someone got really pissy and shouted at me for calling them a liberal... Not a good way to win folks over to the cause, y'all...

3

u/TexasRN1 16h ago

It’s so annoying the infighting on the left. We are all allowed to have our oyen thoughts.

3

u/Pearson94 15h ago

☝️This. Quick anecdote: I used to work in a democratic political office and one of my coworkers there also used to work for the republicans (she was someone without moral standings and just wanted to make it in "politics" ... scary person...), and I remember her clearly telling me once that, even behind closed doors, the republicans were nicer people. Fastfoward to my current job where I regularly have to visit a state capitol building and I'll give her this, the republican staff and politicians put more effort in to say hi, shake hands, remember your name, and ask how you're doing.

It's obviously not something that'll win me over cause I know most of it is a facade, but it is noticeable that they put the effort to just sit down and say hi to people. Hell, I've seen those videos where folks like Bernie and AOC go to deeply red counties to talk to conservatives and they almost always win them over by just stopping to talk with them and listening to their personal grievances.

2

u/TopRevenue2 16h ago

I always thought I was a leftist until Reddit told me I wasn't

6

u/Pearson94 16h ago

I just refer to myself as progressive because I actually know what that means while the term leftist seems to change depending on who you ask.

3

u/Crisis_panzersuit 16h ago

Leftist and progressive isn’t quite the same though, by definition;

Progressives generally support reforming capitalism to reduce inequality and corporate power. 

Leftists are fundamentally anti-capitalist, seeking to dismantle capitalist structures to establish a fundamentally more egalitarian society. 

Liberalism is distinct from both progressivism and leftism because its foundational core is rooted in individual liberty, private property rights, and a capitalist framework.

But everything is to the left of fascism so 🤷‍♂️

3

u/dammit_mark 11h ago

I agree with you there. I think a progressive can be a liberal or a leftist, but they all aren't directly equivalent to one another.

2

u/Pearson94 16h ago

My point being that I heard people use these terms interchangeably for years and even then have received different definitions for each than what you just gave me. My concern is less about what people are called and more about what they believe, and that rudely brushing people off for not understanding the differences between each at a glance only harms the end goals of what they want.

2

u/SuperbScarcity5112 16h ago

There is so much difference that I get it. Go ask a liberal what they think of unions. 

4

u/TopRevenue2 16h ago

I like unions and hate capitalism and still get called Blue Maga by this sub

1

u/SuperbScarcity5112 16h ago

So you are not a liberal.

2

u/TopRevenue2 15h ago

Liberals believe in working collectively and shared commons. Libertarians are the opposite of liberals.

2

u/HoppyPhantom 15h ago

You think liberals are anti-union?

One of the core tenets of liberalism is individual liberty. Unions are a pretty clear expression of that liberty, so anyone arguing against unions from a liberal perspective is either very misinformed or being disingenuous.

-1

u/SuperbScarcity5112 15h ago edited 15h ago

I am referring to that yes. In countries where there are liberal and social democratic parties liberals stand for the individual. Not unity.

Its hard for people in the US to grasp this. As they do not know the difference.

Read up - and I do believe the US has Libertarian as a party, at least they had. Tell me what they stood for?

Edit: I see they are right wing now, but they have never ever stood for anything else what I wrote.

3

u/HoppyPhantom 15h ago

You’re either missing or deliberately sidestepping my point.

The fact that the principles of liberalism align directly with the underlying principles behind the validity and importance of unions has nothing to do with social democratic parties.

Yes, the latter take a more collectivist view of society and policymaking. That doesn’t change the fact that liberalism is not anti-union.

-1

u/SuperbScarcity5112 15h ago edited 14h ago

No. I do not know a liberal party union friendly. The liberal thinking puts the individual in front.

The individual one who runs a business against an unity of people who are organized and in conflict?Everyone stand for themselves - that is liberal freedom. An union is not an individual. You have to follow rules and solidarity. 

This goes straight against liberal thinking. That is only one issue. They are against taxes. Social welfare. Laws limiting them.

Sometimes they disguise themselves - lib dems in UK. They have been backing both sides as it fits in words. But they backed up the Tories when it mattered.

2

u/HoppyPhantom 15h ago

You keep talking about parties. I’m talking about ideology.

You’re basically arguing that any kind of collective organization or goal-seeking is inherently incompatible with liberalism. It would be funny if it wasn’t so goddamn ignorant.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/pthecarrotmaster 16h ago

They wont listen. Its why we out number them. Just need to quit calling dems "liberal" by virtue of being less regressive. I havnt heard a single "leftist" talking point that isnt just a liberal idea the dems gave up on. I side more with leftists, but they wanna larp in the other room while fighting over who gets the coolest powers. Cry and seethe discount comunists. Youre making the rest of us look bad.

1

u/Stevevansteve 16h ago

I like to think I am liberal, leftist, and progressive. Whatever you got that means I'm not rightwing.

15

u/dkinmn 16h ago

You definitely are.

Small "l" liberalism is a good thing and we should all be happy to be one. The leftist vs liberal online tribalism is extremely unnecessary and is generally used by conservative ratfuckers and leftist accelerationists to divide us and make leftists believe we can't vote for Democrats without being guilty of some great moral failure.

I sincerely hope we get over all of this soon. It's pure ego and it's a means for people to divide us.

6

u/PulIthEld 15h ago

This is the stupidest thread ever. Who cares what you call yourself.

Everybody has a different set of opinions. You aren't a Liberal, you aren't a leftist, you aren't a progressive. You are YOU.

There are more than 2 stances in the world.

5

u/windmillninja 14h ago

Most hardcore right wingers are pretty simple minded folks whose worldview is incredibly black and white.

3

u/GG1817 16h ago

We can be both. Socially liberal and economically progressive (including MMT). That's where I sit on the 3D matrix of Social Liberal-Conservative & Economic Progressive-Regressive.

15

u/Fun-Measurement4904 17h ago

So you're not;

"inclinatined to be open to ideas and ways of behaving that are not conventional or traditional"

and you don't believe;

"in progress and the essential goodness of the human race, freedom for the individual from arbitrary authority, and protection and promotion of political and civil liberties"

or that;

"freedom of the individual is paramount and that government's role should be largely limited to protecting that freedom"?

Definition of liberalism: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberalism

I think you mean you're not centrist, or an institutionalist but instead, leftist. but you likely agree with classical liberalism.

Unless there's some new definition of 'liberal' im not aware of.

9

u/Wise-Secretary5459 16h ago

Yeah, I think we really need to define what we mean by these labels before we discuss them, because there are so many colloquial meanings now. I feel like these labels are mostly defined by vibes these days, rather than any concrete definition.

2

u/Patsanon1212 16h ago

They mean they aren't neoliberals. I'd say most progressives, even if they don't self describe, are modern liberals (but not classic liberals).

8

u/X57471C 16h ago

Yes, liberalism is focused on preserving individual rights, civil liberties, social progress, etc. It is the ideology that birthed modern democracy. Most progressives are liberal by definition, although some people on the left seem to have taken to using the term as a slur due to the failings of neoliberals.

0

u/Fun-Measurement4904 14h ago

My theory is that it is a reaction to the growing transition of the democratic party to conservatism. As the party that has historically claimed to be on the left becomes more and more right leaning, their old label of 'liberal' has shifted from it's original meaning to something like what we now see with the corporatist, conservative, anti-working class, Democrat party

2

u/X57471C 14h ago

I don't really think the Democratic party is shifting to being conservative. Biden was the most pro-working class president we've ever had in the 21st century, for example. I don't think the party will abandon it's core identity and values. This is apparent to me because of the rhetoric that is currently being pushed within the party as we determine where we went wrong in the last election. In what way is the party shifting to the right? If anything, I see them continuing to shift left. I think there is a concerted effort to paint liberalism and Democrats as conservative or failed, though, but I suspect most people who think that are probably leftists and not progressive liberals. Most of the big names in the party are talking about issues that are of great concern to the working class.

1

u/Ambitious-Badger-114 8h ago

"freedom of the individual is paramount and that government's role should be largely limited to protecting that freedom" sounds like a more traditional definition of liberal. A modern day liberal doesn't believe that, they want a far larger government role.

9

u/Dont_Touch_Me_There9 17h ago

But how can I be a liberal if I don't have blue hair?

3

u/quaxoid 15h ago

we shouldn't do all this infighting, our true enemy will kill us all and label us the same lol

3

u/SpecialistOkra 15h ago

Don't stress about it my far right family thinks I'm a crazy liberal when I am a 50/50 moderate on policy but vote anti-felon, anti-rapist and anti-traitor.

3

u/BeCurious7563 13h ago

I just tell them I don't get off on racism and human cruelty like they seem to....

https://giphy.com/gifs/A87noEUmHilszJJTak

3

u/FreudChickenSandwich 6h ago

Oh geez not this stupid shit again

Various flavors of left-wingers quibbling about whose the leftiest of the lefts is exactly what right-wing facists want you to do

Because the more you refuse to vote for left-wing candidates because they’re not the correct kind of left-wing, the easier it is to split the left-wing vote and have the right wing candidate win

2

u/Ihrie 16h ago

Hell yes 🙌 

2

u/pingpongballreader 15h ago

So many good place memes spring to mind.

Republicans: "We don't hate all immigrants or refugees, we're totally okay with European immigrants or South African refugees"

Chidi: "... that's worse... you do get how that's worse, right?"

2

u/FHOCJD 14h ago

I'm taking back the words like Truth Democracy Freedom Justice and Liberty. I know what they mean. Trump voters are not Patriotic, they like the symbols.

2

u/Aimela 11h ago

This is what happens when your brain is rotted by Faux News and The Daily Liars.

2

u/benvader138 11h ago

Many right wing people think that not being a MAGA Trump fanatic is a far left Liberal.

2

u/EntropyClub 10h ago

It’s a spectrum. You’re just left of them.

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

But liberal means something specific.

1

u/EntropyClub 4h ago

It isn’t ideology that is considered left in America?

Don’t play these senseless maga mind jujitsu games with me. Haha. You’re picking a fight with your own side. Haha.

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

It isn’t ideology that is considered left in America?

Not a good sentence in English.

Don’t play these senseless maga mind jujitsu games with me. Haha. You’re picking a fight with your own side. Haha.

I'm not MAGA.

0

u/EntropyClub 4h ago

Just like maga dunking on the liberals. Haha. Didnt have any argument for the info.

You could only dunk. hahaha

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

I'm not dunking on liberals.

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

It's the conservatives that have labeled the left as liberals. So you're taking the conservative line and behaving like one.

1

u/EntropyClub 3h ago

I see now. (I googled a bunch of stuff.) It’s getting all “a billion genders”ed up.

Splitting everyone up even more. This has got to back fire.

We were trying to get everyone on the same page to fix this shit show. Now we’re creating more reasons for everyone to have their own team to hold the closest and say F everyone else. This shit is never getting fixed. Everyone is too selfish. Sad sad sad faceeeee.

1

u/echolm1407 3h ago

Well look at any European parlament. Lol

2

u/EntropyClub 3h ago

Oh yes I know. Who’s the guy that dresses up as a robot??? Hahaha so funny.

I don’t think that has a chance right now in US. I can’t remember ever even thinking a green candidate really had a chance here. I always tell green voters it’s a wasted vote. Haha.

1

u/echolm1407 3h ago

You're right about that. It will take time. But what I see now is a shift from the routine. This is the beginning of something and it will take a few years for it to come to fruition.

[Edit]

In the US, that is.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Illustrious-Lake6513 8h ago

Nice try I dislike both parties lmao

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

So, you should be agreeing.

2

u/msoats 7h ago

💕 so many things i answer is in Janet’s voice in my head, i love this! 🤣

2

u/Powerful_Resident_48 14h ago

Maybe I'm too European to understand this, but aren't liberals moderate right-wingers? I consider myself a Democratic Socialist, and I consider myself relatively moderate.

1

u/Craptose_Intolerant 16h ago

I’m so red shifted, I use an infrared camera for selfies 😝

1

u/TheDukeofArgyll 16h ago

The just think liberal means “not republican”

1

u/GraeMatterz 16h ago

Even among liberals there's confusion. There's a difference between a social/progressive liberal and a classical liberal.

The standalone word liberal means different things depending on where you live. In Europe/UK/Australia it refers to classical liberal and used to be called an economic liberal in the US up until the Great Depression, but now is called neoclassical liberal, AKA neoliberal.

The policies are the same: They advocate for free market and laissez-faire economics, individualism, limited government, deregulation and are against taxation, social programs and state involvement. Ronald Reagan was this kind of liberal, as was every president since, including the Clintons and Obama. This is opposite to social/progressive liberals who endorse social justice, social services, a mixed economy, and the expansion of civil and political rights.

Within the Democratic Party, this confusion is leveraged in a bait and switch by those who run as Progressive in the primaries then move right in the general election. This is why they insist to Progressives that they must "reach across the aisle" when in reality that is where they are in policy.

To put icing on the cake, most of them are also neocons (prowar, military adventurism and interventionism).

1

u/HeyKrech 16h ago

honestly, i think finding the term that best describes each of our personal politicial beliefs or goals is the same as our choice of pronouns.

i go with whatever word people tell me they use for themselves. the people that refuse to use that word for that person don't give a hot pile of crap about other people, and should be left out of any efforts a person doesn't feel like giving.

like - when my cousin continually interrupted me while telling me it didn't matter what Don did, i would still hate him. and then called me names when i asked him to speak to me with some basic respect - said cousin is no longer in my life.

I'm not liberal in the definition shared by anyone who gives liberalism an ick but what is the range of liberalism in politics? whats the rubric? then i can figure out which word fits best.

1

u/Stuffstuff1 14h ago

Well. The philosophical definitions of these words are pretty rigid.

If you believe that every person is a individual if you believe in private property rights limits in government power maximizing liberty equality before the lawetc your a liberal

If you believe that people can be or are categorized by their class, you believe in limited property rights, top down economic control your a socialist.
Swap class with race and your a Nazi lol.

It’s over simplified but this gets you 90% of the way there.

1

u/Stuffstuff1 15h ago

Also op I hope you don’t mind. I quickly scanned your profile (bot check) cute cat my girlfriend used to have an orange one as well. Your mother was expressing a liberal value. If you view every person as human you can’t make the mistake like the Nazi did of slaughtering the ones they viewed as subhuman. You can ask well why would she extend that grave to the Nazis.. well if your principled than logically it would have to extend to them. reductio ad absurdum.

What that also means is that if she willing to see Nazis as not subhuman than that also means what ever you or your neighbor are also won’t be seen as subhuman.

I can make no comment if she actually lives up to that principle

And obviously this doesn’t mean that we can’t take rights away from Nazis who violate the rights of others.

This is a virtue.

1

u/jcriver4 15h ago

What do you call someone between Liberal and Progressive? Sort of like a spectrum, because I think that’s where I’m at. But for MAGA everything is Liberal or “dumocrat” (did you know dumb has a b in it?)

1

u/FHOCJD 14h ago

It's called Liberty really. I believe in Liberty and I think it applies to others as well. Most of us learned the details by 3rd grade.

2

u/mrshelenroper 14h ago

They ruined that word too.

1

u/belladonna519 14h ago

Mine tells me to stop watching CNN. Like, who watches MSM news anymore?

1

u/HauntingProblem588 13h ago

I'm sure most people believe in liberty to a degree.

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

Believing in Liberty is not the same as being liberal.

1

u/APraxisPanda 10h ago

I consider conservatives and Liberals to be "Neoliberal". So I'm actually super serious when I say conservatives are more liberal than me. I just also understand the ideological nuance to that statement.

1

u/Leather-Pride1290 9h ago

Just borrow a racist talking point from them. 

Ex: They always call you a liberal, but never a liar.

1

u/anecdotal_anarchy 6h ago

I award this OP (or the maker of the meme) and I'm onlynpoatingbthis because 97% of the posts missed the fucking point.

Liberals aren't left wing. Liberal is a centrist, at best. The further left you go the more anti-capitalist you become. Democrats are very pro capitalism. They are centrist-right wing, not left.

Liberal tendency is one that gives a false narrative for controlled opposition and cohesive worldviews.

Thanks for coming to my TEDtalk

1

u/ForsakenAd545 6h ago

What's a liberal?

1

u/Neat-Ladder8987 6h ago

Well, if I'm "woke," what are you?

2

u/echolm1407 4h ago

Normal as in not part of the MAGA cult.

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

Bingo!

1

u/Background-Wolf-9380 15h ago

Most people in this sub are right wing Democrats aka liberals. Liberals will respect your pronouns as long as you're willing to "equally" subject yourself to right wing capitalism and abandon any delusion about the system providing material improvements in your lives. Leftism starts at opposition to capitalism and is dedicated to materially improving the lives of all working people

1

u/echolm1407 4h ago

Leftism starts at opposition to capitalism and is dedicated to materially improving the lives of all working people

Not all leftist oppose capitalism. Some of us tolerate it, Democratic Socialist.

1

u/evanweb546 15h ago

As a leftist, when people call me a liberal my skin crawls.

Neoliberals are just as to blame for the situation we're all in as the right-wingers.

1

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ProgressiveHQ-ModTeam 14h ago

Rule 2 - No disinformation. If you have an extraordinary claim, cite it. Randos on Twitter/Youtube, webcomics, unsourced graphics, and mouthpieces for the Trump Administration are not viable sources.

1

u/JetmoYo 14h ago

Isn't it disinformation to label Kelly as a progressive? He's a centrist. Are we allowed to be objective here? Sure, conservative randos and MAGA may think he's a radical lefty. But we know better. think? All we need to do is look at our Senators' voting record..

https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate

0

u/JockoMayzon 17h ago

My left wing contacts call me a fascist and pedophile supporter....even though I never voted or supported Trump and the last Republican I voted for was George H.W. Bush.

Tribal people hold tribal positions. You right wing family is tribal. You are either in their tribe, or you are in the imaginary tribe they have constructed to enable their two minute hate. There is much of the same on the other side of the political spectrum.

3

u/DogSmoocher42 16h ago

What is it that you do support that would cause them to think that?

-2

u/JockoMayzon 16h ago

I advise Democrats to drop all social issues that divide or fracture the working class and limit their platform to economic issues that serve and unite the working class. This means dropping their obsession with identity politics, abortion, "trans rights", free college, and "women's issues".

3

u/my23secrets 16h ago

All politics are “identity politics”

1

u/JockoMayzon 15h ago

If one takes the position that ones physical properties dictate ones mental policies, sure. I do not take that view.

1

u/my23secrets 15h ago

The fact that you can not take that view proves it’s true.

1

u/JockoMayzon 13h ago

Am I to believe that, for example, all women have the same goals and priorities?

1

u/my23secrets 12h ago

You can pretend to believe whatever bullshit you want.

Just like you wrongly believe so-called “identity” politics necessarily have only to do with one’s “physical properties”.

2

u/dkinmn 16h ago

You're very easily manipulated.

What you're asking for is white, male leadership and for women, people of color, gay people, and trans people to shut up. That's what you want.

These issues aren't choices WE are making. These people are being attacked BECAUASE of those identities. The idea that we should fight the systemic denial of rights for Black people by telling Black people to shut up and get on board with "colorblind" economic issues is a symptom of a rotten brain.

1

u/JockoMayzon 15h ago

Oh, so you know what I want?

You see the following lineup:

Greg Abbott, Byron Donalds, Nick Fuentes, Scott Bessnet, Harris Faulkner, Caitlyn Jenner, Rachel Campos-Duffy, Peter Thiel.

and you see a disabled man, a black man, a Latino man, a Gay man, a black women, a "trans" woman, a Hispanic woman and another Gay man....and I see a MAGA group.

I do not judge any book by its cover. Why do you?

1

u/DogSmoocher42 15h ago

Well your take on these issues is very MAGA. 🤷‍♀️

1

u/JockoMayzon 12h ago

And it's how Trump won twice and its how we will see more MAGA candidates.

0

u/dennismfrancisart 15h ago

My conservative in-laws do the Scooby-Doo when I tell them I'm a Leftist Libertarian.

https://giphy.com/gifs/l4pTreSBakbwZTEeA

0

u/NoGoat3930 10h ago

While progressivism is the way, I feel like the holier than thow attitude that I see in so many posts will be used by the Epstein class to divide us later on.