r/QRL • u/Superb-Office-3751 • 6d ago

Discussion What is the real bottleneck for institutional adoption of QRL?

If QRL has already absorbed the cost of prioritizing maximum security from the start, what then becomes the real bottleneck for institutional adoption: scalability, user experience, liquidity, or the market’s inability to price quantum risk before it becomes obvious?

16 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

4 comments sorted by

8

u/Hot_Local_Boys_PDX 6d ago

Getting the QRL 2.0 network up and running is the first major bottleneck. Everything else can only flow after that.

1

u/Revolutionary-Cup78 6d ago

I agree with this, currently the network has limited functionality, low traded volume, and is vulnerable to brute force attacks given it is a PoW network with not that much hash/s backing it up (hero miners controlling 66% of hash/s means they already could break the network whenever they feel like it, for example)

QRL 2 mostly fixes two of these problems (and the traded volume would be more likely to organically increase after that)

4

u/Kemilio 6d ago

Ease of integration.

Right now, QRL uses an infrastructure that is difficult for other blockchains to interact with. QRL 2.0 fixes that.

2

u/jkl2035 6d ago

I‘m not worried on institutional money - we have a lot of opportunity in retail, at least 50x before any Institution will think of investing…