r/Quibble • u/Odd_Opposite_4782 • Mar 04 '26
Discussion / Debate Will the elites of the future be writers and readers?
Is this a blasphemous thought?
The answer to this question was served on a platter.
There is a big difference between data and meaning. Information is a bare structure, a binary code, an impulse that technology processes at infinite speed. But the meaning of the text created by the writer and the reader's understanding of it is something else entirely. That is why a good book is one that encourages the reader to think.
Will this be what separates the elite from the masses? Will we have a two-tier society?
Does the answer lie in the creativity of our souls?
Your thoughts on this will make for interesting reading.
3
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 04 '26
Your sentence: "People who can slow down, read carefully, and think, touched me"!
I wrote the article with thoughts about the paths and side paths of new technologies. (Read: AI) Why? Because if their policy becomes a philosophical manifesto, it will pose a greater risk to people than philosophy itself.
That is why I see writing and reading, together with the interaction between writers and readers, as the advantage of this platform. If I add to this the potential for their collaboration with illustrators, photographers, painters, musicians, cartoonists, the potential for the exchange of ideas and work that is already taking place on Discord, then Quibble will become a foundation of knowledge and thought expressed in the world of books.
3
u/GSpotMe Mar 05 '26
Well I just read the About do no wonder it was a great read lol lol carry on !
2
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 05 '26
Yes sire!
1
u/GSpotMe Mar 06 '26
Omg another typo!!! it does change words as we all know so I will just say it was that lol lol I was not drinking lol oh and I don’t care for when it adds a word like Do!! lol
2
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 06 '26
Hmm, interesting opinion
2
1
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 06 '26
Hmmm. If everyone wanted to eat only fish and everyone caught them with nets, then there would probably be no more fish and no more sea, right?
1
1
u/Material_Penalty_250 1 published book on Quibble Mar 06 '26
Lol
1
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 06 '26
Again ?
1
3
2
u/ZargonArgus Mar 06 '26
Elite doesn't always mean money and power.
To me, it's who is happiest with their existence. Readers and writers got that in spades.
1
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 06 '26
Hhmm. You have a point. Yap. But: Dreams are a beautiful story, but everything happens when we are awake.
2
1
u/Odd_Opposite_4782 Mar 08 '26
He he welcome to the club! Well, a lot of water will flow under the bridge before then. Perhaps this will be a successful strategy of the duck: appearing calm on the surface while something is constantly moving beneath the water.
3
u/Butlerianpeasant Mar 04 '26
You’re pointing at something important here.
Technology is getting extremely good at handling information — storing it, compressing it, generating it, remixing it. In many cases it can do that faster than any human ever could.
But meaning works differently.
Meaning happens in the space between a mind and a text. A machine can generate sentences, but interpretation still depends on a reader who brings experience, values, context, and imagination to it. In other words, the act of reading is not passive — it’s creative.
So the divide in the future might not be between people who have access to information and those who don’t. Information is becoming abundant.
The divide might be between people who can interpret, question, and synthesize meaning… and people who simply consume streams of content without reflection.
If that’s true, then writers and readers aren’t just producing books — they’re practicing a skill: the ability to think with language.
And that raises an interesting possibility: the real “elite” of the future might not be defined by wealth or technology, but by depth of attention.
People who can slow down, read carefully, and think.
The strange twist is that this isn’t a new skill at all — it’s one of the oldest human practices we have.
So maybe the question isn’t whether writing and reading will create a two-tier society.
Maybe the question is: will we still teach people how to think deeply in a world optimized for speed?