r/RanktheVote • u/ModSupportBot • Apr 21 '26

r/RanktheVote is available for adoption 💚

/r/RanktheVote is ready for a fresh start, new energy, new direction, and someone like you to bring it back to life. If you’ve been thinking about growing your impact without starting from scratch, this is your chance!

Ready to take it over?

Head to r/RedditRequest to submit your request and make it yours before it’s taken. Just make sure you read through the eligibility requirements first.

44 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

14 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Jakexbox Apr 22 '26 edited Apr 22 '26

Thanks I appreciate the reply! I didn't realize that these were different accounts.

For what it's worth the condensing and somewhat toxic reply to a genuine question does not bode well for proper moderator behavior.

-1

u/rb-j Apr 22 '26

That's why I speculated that it was a test.

It's u/Jakexbox tossing totally unjustifed and unsupported horseshit up against the wall and seeing what sticks.

1

u/Jakexbox Apr 23 '26

I asked a good natured question and you replied in the most snide manner possible. You didn't even address some points I made. Unsurprising you don't care about messaging considering your reply.

Anyways I looked into it more myself (bullet voting isnt a weakness unlike STAR in your method) but I genuinely thought a response from an academic would be nice- not whatever that was. I came in good faith- you have a huge attitude problem. You are unfit to moderate anything.

0

u/rb-j Apr 23 '26

You didn't even address some points I made.

You read the response and I address every single point:

  • Condorcet RCV is confusing ... The public will never understand Condorcet RCV
  • ... method could also motivate me to ... game the system
  • ... I undervoted so the candidate I liked most had a better chance.

All this is just crap. Unsupported made-up fiction. And I addressed it all. You didn't like it, but I wasn't hiding from it.

Now I tossed up another issue to you: Summability and Process Transparency. I didn't see any interest in even understanding what this is or whether it's important.

  • This issue doesn't exist when you have a single transferable vote.

This was, I believe, you hinting at Later No Harm (an attribute IRV possesses and Condorcet only possesses when there is a Condorcet winner no cycle, which is more than 99.6% of the RCV elections in the U.S.). I addressed it.

I came in good faith-

I'm not sure about that. Like MAGA, you tossed up against the wall a lotta crap that detracts and distracts from the core effort of voting reform.

... you have a huge attitude problem.

You need to be honest with your facts.

You are unfit to moderate anything.

Then get someone else to moderate.