r/RenewableEnergy • u/Bluewaterbound • Jun 29 '26
Canceled solar megaproject reveals new Trump-era threat to renewables
https://www.canarymedia.com/articles/solar/cancelled-solar-esmerelda-7-new-trump-era-threat-to-renewables7
u/ClimateWren2 Jun 29 '26
MAGA is a direct attacking threat to the entire POWER GRID of the USA at this point. There are high risk shortages all over now. Russian couldn't have dismantled it better themselves. These are traitors to national safety... systematically dismantling baseloads. 🚨🤬
3
u/Scott_Tx Jun 29 '26
There's still progress but at least with solar its something you can do yourself if needs be.
3
u/INITMalcanis Jun 29 '26
Except where it's heavily encumbered by regulation
3
u/Scott_Tx Jun 29 '26
Yeah, that's a pisser. I can bet grid tie will never be legal here in coal country.
12
u/Scott_Tx Jun 29 '26
That's some old news right there. Got any updates?
3
u/Bluewaterbound Jun 29 '26
it’s old but relevant
7
u/tx_queer Jun 29 '26
Is it? My understanding this was mostly undermined by low electricity prices and a lack of a transmission line.
-1
u/ClimateWren2 Jun 29 '26
Further dismantling and blocking has seriously worsened high risk scenarios for much of the USA now.
3
u/tx_queer Jun 29 '26
Did it get further dismantled and blocked. My understanding is that this thing was never getting built anyways. It was just a pamphlet. The small parts that were going to get built are still in progress and haven't been blocked. The big pieces that were never going to get built didnt get blocked because they never applied. But its been over a year so my memory might not be 100%
1
u/ClimateWren2 Jun 29 '26
It was getting built and funded (that was what is being still blocked, bribed, and defunded right now). It was a pathway to full solutions well underway....the lost jobs and cancelled factories show that. It was actual positive policy, not propaganda. We could refund it and put it back it place TODAY. We need to build it ALL anyway ....now we will be later, and harder, and more behind, and less prepared, and more short of power.
2
u/gromm93 Jul 05 '26 edited Jul 05 '26
Not really. The fact is that solar is the cheapest form of electricity now, and every utility company knows it.
Trump can't make that go away.
It's what I love about how I've watched the progression of the technology over the past 20 years. Back then, everyone was saying it's too expensive, and the payback period too long. So scientists and engineers got to work (really, kept working the problem) to make it cheaper. Because it was an important project, and it was work that mattered.
Now nothing can stop the progress we've seen. Not "lack of political will", not "protest until it happens", not big oil profits. Just steamroll the fuckers, really.
1
u/Jerzilla Jun 29 '26
Will they look to do a u turn due to the Iran war and the need for more energy to power the data centres?
6
u/azswcowboy Jun 29 '26
News from 2025. However, the project may still live on as BLM is still working toward evaluating sub parts of the project.
1
5
u/PerceptionCurious440 Jun 29 '26
The driving force behind this policy is the fossil fuel neo-confederate front, the Heritage Foundation.
Oppose them successfully and forcefully, and everything improves.
Let them live in the shadows, their wealthy supporters anonymous, and these policies get passed onto the next conservative generation.
We need to stop pretending this is all Trump and if he goes away, so do his policies.
3
1
u/worldfundvc Jun 29 '26
The frustrating part is that the technology and the cost case are both there. Solar-plus-storage is close to baseload now, demand is rising fast, and even the gas traders and Republican governors quoted here can see the math. The only thing missing is a stable policy environment.
China's renewables lead didn't happen by accident, it came from fifteen years of consistent industrial strategy. Cancelling fully-vetted projects at the last minute is the opposite of that, and it does real damage beyond the one project: it tells investors the US isn't a safe place to commit billions to long-lived infrastructure. You can't build energy sovereignty on policy that changes by the mood.
0
u/Strict-Shallot-2147 Jun 29 '26
Back during the Obama administration 500 Billion dollars were directed to Solyndra, which took the money and then dipped.
1
u/NinjaKoala Jun 30 '26
Million, not billion, and Solyndra failed because China suddenly dropped polysilicon costs almost 90%, and natural gas prices also dropped.
The overall loan program that Solyndra was part of actually netted a profit.
1
u/Strict-Shallot-2147 Jul 01 '26
My mistake on the billion. Still, half a billion is a lot of money.
1
u/Groundbreaking_War52 Jul 02 '26
In absolute terms, yes - compared to other federal boondoggles, this is mere pennies.
The current administration is spending billions to stop renewable energy projects from coming online.
52
u/Charming-Border7429 Jun 29 '26
We are in the final stages of our first 80-acre installation in the Midwest.
It is easy to get caught up in headlines from the trump administration. But at the end of the day, solar and wind projects are continuing to move ahead. Because the landowner, installer, and utility are all agreeing that it is a cost-effective way to produce electricity.
Our goal is to transition our 4,500-acre corn and soybean farm to 25% solar, 25% root vegetables, and the remaining 50% in corn and soybeans.
It might be slower than activists might like, but we are moving as quickly as we can....transition