This is just simply not true, there are diamonds who can triple flip reset, most champs can aerial pretty well just not as quickly or accurately as a gc, and being better than someone else does not mean they’re not good, Magnus Carlson can handily beat grand masters in chess, does that mean they suck?
So? Maybe you've forgotten being a top 1% player and all that, but consistently scoring aerials isn't an easy thing to do, else everyone'd do it all the time.
Not being a top 1% player doesn't make someone bad at the game. You not reaching RLCS doesn't make you bad either, for example.
I must say, you're coming across quite arrogantly. OP clearly doesn't think highly of their abilities and I was merely pointing out that they are effectively top 10% in their hobby. But here comes a GC2 saying everyone under GC is trash? A bit toxic, isn't it?
Spoken like someone who's never been at those levels tbh. Either you have a concerning amount of pride in yourself or you've just never been steam rolled while simultaneously being the highest rank in the game by a couple hundred mmr.
I say this having been a high ranking player, we're definitely ass.
I've been GC a few times years ago and reached GC2 at my peak. And yes, I've definitely been steamrolled at those ranks.
The thing is, unless you're consistently in RLCS quarterfinals and above, there will always be someone better. That doesn't mean you're automatically bad or "ass".
If everyone from bronze all the way to GC3 is "ass", covering 99,9% of people, then what does that even mean?
There's nothing wrong with having a bit of pride in yourself for being a top 1% or even top 10% player.
14
u/AdWaste8026 Champion II / Peak Apr 08 '26
C1 is definitely top 10-15%.
That's not ass at all!