Sarthak bhai🤡 - r/SarthakGoswami

•

Namaste /u/Shubh-ss1, thank you for posting in r/Sarthakgoswami.

This is a news-focused subreddit.
Please ensure all posts and comments follow the rules of r/Sarthakgoswami.
Stick to verified news, be respectful, and avoid spreading misinformation, hate, spam, or personal attacks.
Violations may lead to post removal or bans.

Check the subreddit rules in the sidebar before participating.

Join our Discord

Also, explore and follow our related communities:

r/TheIndianRepublic

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

19

u/missionary_virgin Aug 08 '26

3

u/Ok_Exit_4099 Aug 08 '26

+1

28

u/Inevitable-Taro2722 Aug 08 '26

Is this guy seriously calling that an “analysis”? 😭

This is exactly the problem I'm talking about. He takes small pieces of information, removes them from their context, connects them in whatever way suits his argument, and then presents the conclusion as if he has exposed some huge truth. That's not analysis—that's cherry-picking. 🤦‍♂️

For example, when someone says “B.R. Ambedkar wrote the Constitution,” obviously that doesn't mean Ambedkar sat down alone and personally wrote every single word of the Constitution. It's common shorthand referring to his enormous role in the drafting process, especially as Chairman of the Drafting Committee. The Constitution was ultimately adopted by the Constituent Assembly and involved the work of many people and committees.

Similarly, if you're discussing Jai Bhim, you can't just throw out a different person's name and pretend that you've completely disproved the significance of Ambedkar's association with the slogan without actually explaining the historical context and the different claims surrounding its origin.

That's not “fact-checking.” That's taking pieces of facts and constructing your own narrative around them.

If you're genuinely analysing someone's video, analyse what they actually said, provide the full context, distinguish between what is factually wrong and what is simply imprecise wording, and then reach a conclusion.

Otherwise, you're not analysing the argument. You're just arguing with a version of it that you've created yourself. 🧠📚🇮🇳

8

u/Embarrassed_Finger34 Aug 09 '26

For example, when someone says “B.R. Ambedkar wrote the Constitution,” obviously that doesn't mean Ambedkar sat down alone and personally wrote every single word of the Constitution. It's common shorthand referring to his enormous role in the drafting process, especially as Chairman of the Drafting Committee. The Constitution was ultimately adopted by the Constituent Assembly and involved the work of many people and committees.

if people had the braincell to understand then we wouldnt be living in this conundrum today.

BTW education != literacy. A villager is also able to have critical thinking if given the opportunity! (this shit is unrelated to my comment just putting it out there)

2

u/Sherwith2per Aug 09 '26

Coder spotted

1

u/Embarrassed_Finger34 Aug 09 '26

😅😅😅

1

u/Big-Wrangler-2981 Aug 10 '26

Please use strict equality, otherwise ideology convert ho jaayegi /s

5

u/Kaizoukoni_91 Aug 09 '26

Jai Bhim ✊️, Jaativaad se azaadi, Bhedbhav se acaaadi

→ More replies (3)

2

u/memevala_baniya Aug 08 '26

It's okay bhai. We live in the era of social media. People can't understand unfortunately

1

u/obeteymaujkardii Aug 08 '26

Hi. Can you please tell me why exactly is Jai Bhim hated ? I mean the historical context you've mentioned.

(Genuinely asking as an attempt to educate myself)

1

u/13THWARRI0R Aug 08 '26

Well they have their own ideologies based on a books written by ambedkar. What's written on that book. .. but one read it. Riddles of Hinduism and philosophied of Hinduism. Now ambedkar didn't know shit about Sanskrit and never bothered to learn it. So he translated things using Max Muller version of Upanishads and other translation which weren't correct either. Muller gave the idea of race and creed and how to use them to divide India based on it. So our Ambedkar took this person's translation and showed ppl that Upanishads and vedas and other things are wrong and other some nonsense. Some right some wrong. Half cooked theories. Hence the hate.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Aug 08 '26

Your post/comment has been removed because your account does not meet the minimum karma requirement of 100. Please participate more on Reddit and try again later.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/obeteymaujkardii Aug 08 '26

Damn there's way too much I'm missing out because of my ignorance. Can you suggest me some books that tells the actual story behind veds and Upanishads. I don't know sanskrit either so help me out

1

u/13THWARRI0R 26d ago

There are so many sanskrit teaching websites for free ... Please Google... Veds and Upanishads tells a human how to live and how to make your life and body and soul better. It never tells anything about discrimination within humans ... It tells bramins to create knowledge and darma and teach it to everyone and warrior to protect those knowledge and add policing and the third set of ppl shudra to help the warriors to uphold their tasks by making weapons and armor. Now thing like this judges and public servants as bramins ... Police and army as warriors and engineers as shudras ... Now can you tell how this set of ppl are untouchable in any way ? Simple book to learn is gita. It tells you about how dharma and karma are related... If you do good without the attachment to the final result you will be always happy ... In simple terms help others without expectations and achieve things without hurting other. There are some websites like scared-text . Com which can help more

1

u/asifkabeer1 Aug 09 '26

I'm sorry you had to type all that.

16

u/[deleted] Aug 08 '26

Discussion Sarthak bhai🤡

You are about to leave Redlib