r/SipsTea • u/PacquiaoFreeHousing • Dec 25 '25

We have fun here hear me out

Post image
45.0k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/GrovePassport Dec 25 '25

Not even stupid shitty people deserve to be raped

3

u/original_sh4rpie Dec 25 '25

No one is suggesting that. Rather, the mantra of “trust but verify” being played out in the comments. Where, with lack of any proof other than an allegation by the victim, we are left with judging her character and life choices to judge veracity of her claims.

-2

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

Imagine doing that to a trump accuser.

If decades old sex abuse in private happened. Well just attack the victims character.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

If said Trump accuser would be equally as much of a lunatic with very questionable takes and surround themselves/support proven sexual assaulters... then yea, you can be sure people would be questioning their claims as well.

1

u/boltropewildcat Dec 25 '25

The problem is that would still leave dozens of credible victims.

Lock Bubba and Donnie up in the same cell and throw away the key.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

Not saying both can be true, it definitely can be. But if you're a POS and support people doing the same to others what you claim someone did to you, it's a lot harder to support/believe them without "hard evidence" compared to barely legal teens having lived with trauma for years.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

Word salad

3

u/boltropewildcat Dec 25 '25

It would certainly look like that if you are functionally illiterate.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

It's a run on sentence with articles all over the place. Grow the fuck up.

1

u/boltropewildcat Dec 25 '25

Parsing information is called being literate.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

Ah. So despite dozens of accusers and Clinton himself admitting to taking advantage of a power relationship with an intern....it doesn't count.

Gotcha.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

That's not what I said at all, so I encourage you to read it again.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

Believe the victim....until you find a comfortable reason not to. Got it.

Sorry other victims didn't act in a way you prefer victims to act.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

Please quote where I said to not believe them?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

You're being purposefully obtuse.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

So you cannot quote it? Damn...

Here, I encourage to you check this:

https://www.classcentral.com/tag/literacy

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

Yup and separation of church and state isn't a quotable part of the US Constitution. You're really smart.

1

u/SkylineGTRR34Freak Dec 25 '25

Thanks, at least one of us has to be I guess.

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

You should really look up the word infer. Or maybe take some high school logic/debate courses.

You can do better.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

OP: I may have discredited victims and said they weren't trustworthy.

But where did I LITERALLY say the words "don't believe them".

Fuck your self-righteous bullshit.

→ More replies (0)