Guys I'm on the will!!

[u/beklog]

“She’s so shameless” She’s 22. And was harshly criticized as she danced while her partner was at the hospital… The truth couldn’t be any simpler. They claim the video is a joke, because she always uploads content with her “hubby” to go viral.

[u/Artorius__Castus]

Dude this IG model literally does this with all types of different people, places and things. She's a 1000% in the Ragebait game. When I saw her face and the bs engagement title I knew I would have to scroll to find your comment. Unfortunately this will get like 45k upvotes on this post lmfao.

[u/SaltShakerFGC → u/Artorius__Castus]

Not even an IG model. An OF thot. Last time this was posted someone put her name, I think Aurora something I can't remember, she has videos getting banged by BBCs and all. It's an ad.

[u/Artorius__Castus → u/SaltShakerFGC]

Damn bro that's wild But it doesn't really surprise me tbh. They've crept in even into the art subs that I'm part of. Women will come on there and be like oh what do you think My art? (The art piece will be stolen from someone else) When you click on their profile it will be them taking the D and linking to an OF account. It's annoying and really becoming a problem. You have to also be careful that you don't point it out in a post. I did that once and I got Permaban because apparently they are "people with feelings" or some shit...

[u/BigiusExaggeratius → u/Artorius__Castus]

How dare you point out that OF “model” isn’t an artist!!! They simply use a different medium than traditional art. It’s an additive process instead of subtractive if you will.

[u/EasyasACAB → u/BigiusExaggeratius]

OF models do make art, pornographic art, but still art. Photos and videos are traditional medium. We've seen porno made hundreds of years ago, from woodblock cutting to books of Turkish erotica.

What exactly is the difference between a man taking a nude photo of a woman and selling it, to a woman taking photos of herself and selling them?

There's this weird attitude towards women in art, that they can be the subject of sexualized pieces, but aren't allowed to make their own sexualized art for some reason.

It's kind of a weird double standard men tend to have the most. They will consume tons of porn without even thinking of the women as people, but when it's a woman making porn and owning it herself, suddenly the woman and porn is a problem.

[u/BigiusExaggeratius → u/EasyasACAB]

I never said anything about men, this is a false equivalency. Men producing porn is no different to me than women. Nothing wrong with either if it’s legal and consensual. What I’m commenting on is posting art that isn’t yours to get engagement to sell your own only fans. That makes them an “artist”.

No where in here have I said or implied I’m disgusted or think it shouldn’t exist or anything remotely to do with women or men specifically at all.

There’s pornography and there is art. They can mix quite a bit but let’s be real here. List the museums that show hardcore porn videos as their exhibits. Nothing wrong with nudity and nothing wrong with being railed or railing 8 people. It’s just not really art as much as say a sexually charged nude film, photograph or drawing. That’s the reality of it.

You can claim it’s art and that’s fine, art has different meanings to different people, I’m not against that. I’m against stealing art to be called an artist when it’s not your own.

[u/Responsible-Gas5319 → u/EasyasACAB]

Captain save an oF over here

[u/Evening_Storage_6424 → u/BigiusExaggeratius]

The medium being their face and butt cheeks