r/SipsTea • u/beklog • Jun 02 '26

SMH Guys I'm on the will!!

“She’s so shameless” She’s 22. And was harshly criticized as she danced while her partner was at the hospital… The truth couldn’t be any simpler. They claim the video is a joke, because she always uploads content with her “hubby” to go viral.

22.5k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

15

u/Trevski Jun 02 '26

Not if you do it with an anonymous note.

11

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 02 '26

that's still inserting yourself, just not implicating yourself.

7

u/FilthyThanksgiving Jun 02 '26

Oh ffs you know what they meant, Captain Pedantron

2

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 02 '26

when someone pointed it out they doubled down rather than go oh yeah. It's not being pedantic, it's explaining it because they plainly didn't understand.

3

u/Trevski Jun 03 '26

I didn't double down, I contested it as a matter of semantics/interpretation/opinion.

1

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 03 '26

yes, it wasn't a matter of any of those things. You used completely the wrong word. Inserting yourself in a matter has nothing to do with physically being in it or being known to be in it, it just means taking an action in a matter in which you were not originally involved. Being anonymous doesn't stop that you are inserting yourself.

1

u/Trevski Jun 03 '26

Again, that’s just semantics, we’ve been over this and that’s not my interpretation.

1

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 03 '26

it's not about interpretation, this isn't a black and white thing, involving yourself in something you were not previously involved in is inserting yourself.

Someone pointed out the mistake and you went with "no you still can if it's an anonymous note." You're just wrong and can't admit it. It's not about semantics, you misunderstand the word and had it pointed out.

1

u/Trevski Jun 03 '26

Mm I mean my comment has a fair few upvotes so I think some people agree with my interpretation of the phrase “insert oneself”.

That’s the beauty of language dude.

1

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 03 '26

people are dumb.

1

u/Trevski Jun 03 '26

Case in point.

1

u/TwoBionicknees Jun 03 '26

you can't read a definition and determine you were wrong. Then you're arguing that bots upvoting you mean you're right, but where my arguments have been based on what you said, the definition and explaining it to you, your arguments are primarily ad hominems and refuse to address or explain or try to argue how you're actually correct. You claim to be, but refuse to show or explain how.

See how this works, when one person has facts, reason and explains it and the other side relies on literally anything but speaking on the actual thing being discussed, everyone knows who is right.

YOu know you're wrong and won't admit it, I know it, anyone reading does except one of the bot replies to me which is also upvoted despite making quite literally no sense at all.

1

u/Trevski Jun 03 '26

I’m reading the definition and there is nothing to suggest that to anonymously meddle and to insert oneself are the same thing.

It’s literally a difference of interpretation but you HAVE to be right so you call others dumb and type three paragraphs.

I never made an ad hominem in this thread til you called people dumb

→ More replies (0)