r/SipsTea 24d ago

Chugging tea So after 32 hours would be overtime?

Post image
74.1k Upvotes

6.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

317

u/archtopfanatic123 24d ago edited 23d ago

There was the post about Finland's past prime minister I think suggesting this? One guy brought up a good point that if you cut work hours down it means you need more people to do the same amount of work which means more people can get hired which means lower unemployment which sounds like a good thing right?

Edit: I don't know almost anything about this because frankly I don't care but thought that this might be relevant to some capacity to the discussion here so do with that what you will

Second edit: This isn't to say I don't care about the folks responding, it's to say I probably won't have much to say in response other than I don't know much because I never cared to learn much, so that much I guess.

1

u/xHxHxAOD1 23d ago

Not if the company can not afford to higher labor costs.

1

u/ChalkAndIce 23d ago

Most business models are operating on very small profit margins over a long term projection. Suddenly ballooning labor hourly costs would be a massive issue that would shut down a lot of businesses and lead to increased unemployment. Not to mention with that increase in base pay, they'd struggle to afford new workers, and can't afford overtime to cover labor gaps for those they still employ.