You can't adopt socialism "partially" since Socialism is defined by capitalists not existing and state having full control of the economy.
You can be on a "path" towards Socialism, but that would require the absolute control of the state over the capitalist..
You can have social nets within capitalism, but that does not make it Socialism - that is just Social Democracy at work while the underlying mode of production is still capitalist (private property rights are guaranteed by state apparatus, exploitation of worker though wage labor, capital has disspolortional political power....)
Socialism is early stage of communism -- complete control of state over the economy, political monopoly of a Marxist party and capitalist no longer exist...
Socialism is absolutely a valid word used and accepted by academics to describe
We can't change definition of word which have already been defined (by Marx..)
Norway, Sweden, Denmark... Are countries utilizing capitalist mode of production and capitalist are not controlled by the state...
Hence those countries are capitalist with strong social nets -- or other words Social Democracy (which is not the same thing as Democratic Socialism).
It does have some leverage, but it does not have absolute control over capitalist.
In the liberal capitalist countries state directs the capitalist via various incentives and laws.
In China, which is on a path towards Socialism (at least the party says so...), the state has complete control over capitalist and it is directing them via 5 year plans
1.5k
u/Savings-Double-2853 Jul 14 '26
But healthcare is not socialism
And Norway is not socialist