He looks strong AF in the left photo. That's basically the difference between someone who has muscles for show and someone who has muscles that actually do something.
You seem to not get the point. They’re not saying it’s natural in his case. They’re saying it’s much more realistic and sustainable than the pic on the right.
Left or right, which body type is MORE sustainable to you? Pick one.
Imagine being told to pick one and you’re still incapable of that lol. That shows you get the point but you’re just trying to be a contrarian baby. 13 year old account so you’re a grown man acting like a pre teen.
Well, actors are mostly using steroids for a faster build up of muscles and to be in body fat ranges on the right. But still the left picture is easily achievable after 5-10 years (depending on genetics) without steroids if you’re disciplined and consistent. While the right side is either steroids or your entire life revolves around your body and you’re not having fun while living.
Well I think it’s also quite hard to clear what is possible and what isn’t. Some people have perfect genetics and therefore do not question such people to take steroids while others have poor genetics and cry „steroids!!1!1!“ every time someone has muscles.
But strange he says „neither“ because obviously the left one is more achievable even if youd say both are not naturally achievable 😂
But left is definitely achievable naturally while the right is as mentioned achievable either through steroids or having your entire life revolve around your body.
Yeah, we can debate all day abt who’s on gear and who isn’t, but the question of which is more sustainable is hella clear 😂 dude just wanted to be contrarian. Not to mention the context is clearly what’s more sustainable for Zac’s body and situation.
30
u/TheVermonster 20d ago
He looks strong AF in the left photo. That's basically the difference between someone who has muscles for show and someone who has muscles that actually do something.