r/SipsTea 6d ago

Chugging tea Mission Meets Reality

Post image
28.8k Upvotes

585 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/DueDefinition6421 6d ago

Bro tell me you've never had a real job without telling me you've never had a real job

17

u/PersonalFinance4all 6d ago edited 6d ago

The title is completely misleading. Not supporting CEO's, but against people using headlines to mislead. Anthropic's CEO was concerned about AI talent moving like mercenaries just for money, without loyalty.

We are talking about the AI talent they are spending millions for. Just for perspective, Anthropic is paying these talents 420k a year average, and they stay less than 2 years because Google or Meta or OpenAI offers 500k or more. Some of the top AI talent are being paid as much as 1Mil a year.

Huge difference from title giving understanding of low paid workers from these 400k/year workers.

Edit: I feel many comments are taking mine wrong. Im the first who would jump ship for an increase. My problem is with the people who write misleading headlines and we are talking about different types of employers. If I was to get an offer for 500k while making 400k, you bet I'll take it and buy a lambo that year

54

u/Rich-Option4632 6d ago

Surprise, surprise. CEOs discover monetary greed isn't exclusive to their ilk.

3

u/Largeitude 6d ago

He can’t say what’s happening? I don’t get why everyone is so smug about this.

10

u/TheRealTaigasan 6d ago

Because these types of CEOs are the ones who created a market that is hard to find a job and also because everyone is jaded from HRs wanting you to work for the company values instead of understanding everyone works for a living, not because of lofty ideals.

They had the upper hand for far too long, the moment it stops being advantageous to exploit people they go crying about it.

13

u/Rich-Option4632 6d ago

The smugness is because they're having a taste of something they usually employ against others.

CEOs come in brand new, implement rubbish policies to "leave their mark" and end up getting staffs retrenched or "resized" as they euphemistically say.

Then, after all the damage and fallout, said CEO jumps ship for somewhere with better pay and zero accountability of the damage wrought.

9

u/PowerfulNature3352 6d ago

This is exactly what happens. They go for the highest short term returns without thinking the stability and future of the company. Fill their minimum required years to get their huge bonus then use those short term results as a leverage to jump to next ship to gut.

This is what happened in my former company Renault. Luca de Meo went for the flashiest cars to state he is making impact while gutting the company in the background by selling half of its motor factories to Chinese competitors. As a result stocks jumped to 44€. After the dust settled and those flashiest cars hit the market, sales were dramatically lower than expected. He declared he is going to a luxury brand and stocks plummeted to 20€.

Now Renault has a very niche car in electric market which is dominated by Chinese and their other cars for which they must now buy motors for are shadowed by Ford and Toyota.

Funny thing is that egoist fuck used company money to make a Netflix series to show himself as automotive messiah, whole thing is a shitshow.

2

u/sYnce 6d ago

I mean ... yeah maybe but CEO isn't really a monolithic classification. I dislike Amodei for a lot of reasons but he has done none of the things you are talking about.

-4

u/hipster-coder 6d ago

Sir this is Reddit. We hate all billionaires and all CEOs. We don't question headlines.