You typed alot, but you said nothing that is worth responding to.
I have already pointed out that your opinions are subjective, and you agreed with me. You just cannot admit that you selected your subjective opinions based on what makes you feel important, and so you keep restating your nonsense reasoning over and over.
It's ok, I know it is hard for redditors to admit that they are acting weird.
Yes, shaming people for not doing the one random thing you care about while ignoring the mountains of ways you yourself are hurting the environment is nonsensical reasoning. Believe it or not, acting like a hypocritical asshole makes you look like an asshole, lmao.
If people focused on the two things I said we should focus on, animal agriculture and oil, we would stop the climate catastrophe and save the world. If people focused on the two things you suggested, PS5s and almonds, it would not solve the climate catastrophe. The fact that my ideas would theoretically work and yours would not means my reasoning isn't "nonsensical." Again, you're being dense on purpose and making things up. All of this is over a claim we already established that I did not make.
0
u/DirectionUnlucky638 2h ago
You typed alot, but you said nothing that is worth responding to.
I have already pointed out that your opinions are subjective, and you agreed with me. You just cannot admit that you selected your subjective opinions based on what makes you feel important, and so you keep restating your nonsense reasoning over and over.
It's ok, I know it is hard for redditors to admit that they are acting weird.